315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10124876)
1. The changing landscape of human experimentation: Nuremberg, Helsinki, and beyond.
Annas GJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):119-40. PubMed ID: 10124876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Justice in Nuremberg: the doctors' trial--60 years later. A reminder.
Adam YG
Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-5. PubMed ID: 17402338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Ethical issues of human experimentation with special reference to informed consent].
Saso L; Silvestrini B
Minerva Med; 2000 Oct; 91(10):255-65. PubMed ID: 11236391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics.
Moreno JD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 9212522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Informed consent in human experimentation (Nürenberg Code)].
Ishy R
Harefuah; 1997 Sep; 133(5-6):193-5. PubMed ID: 9461688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Nuremberg doctors' trial in historical context.
Marrus MR
Bull Hist Med; 1999; 73(1):106-23. PubMed ID: 10189729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Modern medicine and the emergence of biomedical ethics.
Grunfeld GB
Caduceus; 1992; 8(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 1643532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurology's witness to history: part II. Leo Alexander's contributions to the Nuremberg Code (1946 to 1947).
Shevell MI
Neurology; 1998 Jan; 50(1):274-8. PubMed ID: 9443492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ethical principles in human scientific research].
Cruz-Coke R
Rev Med Chil; 1994 Jul; 122(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 7732235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fifty years of the Nuremberg Code: a time for retrospection and introspection.
Faraone SV; Gottesman II; Tsuang MT
Am J Med Genet; 1997 Jul; 74(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 9259366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. medical research in the developing world: ignoring Nuremberg.
Roman J
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2002; 11(2):441-60. PubMed ID: 12058774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct and unethical human experimentation: historic parallels and moral implications.
Lefor AT
Nutrition; 2005; 21(7-8):878-82. PubMed ID: 15975498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Informed consent. Historical background and current problems].
Jensen AB
Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Nov; 152(48):3591-3. PubMed ID: 2256217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights.
Shuster E
Lancet; 1998 Mar; 351(9107):974-7. PubMed ID: 9734958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ethical aspects of examining patients without access to legal representation--history and current situation in Germany].
Helmchen H
Folia Med Cracov; 2000; 41(1-2):169-82. PubMed ID: 11210798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ's correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial.
Weindling P
BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1467-70. PubMed ID: 8973237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retreat from Nuremberg: can we prevent unethical medical research?
Horner JS
Public Health; 1999 Sep; 113(5):205-10. PubMed ID: 10557112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The legacy of the Nuremberg Code.
Callahan D
Cas Lek Cesk; 1998 Apr; 137(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 9650349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]