These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10124878)

  • 1. Toward an international standard of scientific inquiry.
    Smith GP
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):167-91. PubMed ID: 10124878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The morality of biotech patents: differing legal obligations in Europe?
    Ford R
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1997 Jun; 19(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 16538738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical and legal issues in technology: xenotransplantation.
    Bach FH; Ivinson AJ; Weeramantry C
    Am J Law Med; 2001; 27(2-3):283-300. PubMed ID: 11467113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulating transfer and use of fetal tissue in transplantation procedures: the ethical dimensions.
    Bell NM
    Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(3):277-94. PubMed ID: 7702075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.
    Palombi L
    Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patenting of genetic material: are the benefits to society being realized?
    Willison DJ; MacLeod SM
    CMAJ; 2002 Aug; 167(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 12186174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Much ado about gene patents: the role of foreseeability.
    Gulliford MJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2004; 34(2):711-45. PubMed ID: 15115032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Human rights and organ transplantation. V. Transplantation of embryonic tissue into the human brain].
    Madrazo I
    Gac Med Mex; 1993; 129(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7926404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption.
    McBratney A; Nielsen K; McMillan F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):1023-5. PubMed ID: 15286651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who deserves the patent pot of gold?: an inquiry into the proper inventorship of patient-based discoveries.
    Ho CM
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2004; 7(2):185-243. PubMed ID: 15675072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality patents.
    Sinclair K
    Australas Biotechnol; 1994; 4(5):284. PubMed ID: 7765675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attack of the clones: patent law and stem cell research.
    Rimmer M
    J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):488-505. PubMed ID: 12852321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protecting rights to early-stage technology.
    Shuster MJ; Su H; Blaug S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 12776151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reexamining the research exemption.
    Flores MA; Campbell C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jun; 23(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 15940230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 1992 biotechnology agenda: a message for candidates Bush and Clinton.
    Duzan SA
    Healthspan; 1992 Sep; 9(8):12-5. PubMed ID: 10122052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patenting Dr. Venter's genetic findings: is the National Institutes of Health creating hurdles or clearing the path for biotechnology's voyage in the twenty-first century?
    Riley PJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():309-26. PubMed ID: 10134812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are patents and research compatible?
    Ducor P
    Nature; 1997 May; 387(6628):13-4. PubMed ID: 9139814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From human embryos, hope for 'spare parts'--but research renews debate over use of fetal cells.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 1998 Nov; 132(20):73. PubMed ID: 10187097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics.
    Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patents, innovation, and privatization: Commentary on: "Data management in academic settings: an intellectual property perspective".
    Albin RC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 20882419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.