189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10125030)
1. Survey and enforcement proposal requires facility attention.
Cook MH; Turner SA
Provider; 1993 Apr; 19(4):48-9. PubMed ID: 10125030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole new ballgame--providers prepare for enforcement.
Burgess KL
Provider; 1995 Feb; 21(2):41-2, 44, 46. PubMed ID: 10140828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Problems persist with enforcement rule. Surveys find most facilities out of compliance as moratorium ends.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1995 Nov; 21(11):25-6. PubMed ID: 10152227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nursing home reform: objective regulation or subjective decisions?
Robbins MK
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Jan; (191):9-35. PubMed ID: 10144586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bracing for enforcement.
Myder JA
Provider; 1994 Apr; 20(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 10133532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey, certification and enforcement procedures for nursing facilities.
Rife J; Chittick R; Freeman T
J Long Term Care Adm; 1996; 24(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 10164257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HCFA cleans up survey procedures.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Feb; 17(2):22. PubMed ID: 10134013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informal dispute resolution: should you or shouldn't you?
Schessler CE
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Nov; 21(11):73-4. PubMed ID: 10346151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nursing home group rips new inspection rules.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1992 Sep; 22(36):20. PubMed ID: 10120350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare and Medicaid programs; survey, certification and enforcement of skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities--HCFA. Final rule and correction to final regulations.
Fed Regist; 1995 Sep; 60(188):50115-20. PubMed ID: 10151187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nursing homes and consumers attempt to make peace.
Robinson ML
Healthspan; 1986 Oct; 3(9):3-8. PubMed ID: 10279338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding administrative appeals.
Bianculli JL
Provider; 1999 Feb; 25(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 10345492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mixed messages. Just as HHS debuts plan to boost accountability, CMS looks to ease inspections.
Lovern E
Mod Healthc; 2001 Nov; 31(48):6-7, 3. PubMed ID: 11765651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High court rebuffs challenge to survey enforcement process.
Gallant M
Contemp Longterm Care; 2000 Jun; 23(6):45-6. PubMed ID: 11067370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Overdue nursing homes rules out.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1989 Feb; 30(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 10303265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Enforcement heats up as HCFA and Congress spar.
Fogg RJ
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Dec; 21(12):43. PubMed ID: 10346156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenge to HCFA survey and enforcement procedures could end up before Supreme Court.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Sep; 6(18):1-2. PubMed ID: 10185933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surviving the survey. New process turns up the heat on administrators.
Sullivan JG
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Nov; 18(11):69-70. PubMed ID: 10153600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Survey to stress quality assurance.
Wagner L
Provider; 1995 Jul; 21(7):37-8. PubMed ID: 10143788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Providers disappointed in decision on deemed status; reaction to proposed new enforcement initiatives mixed.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jul; 6(15):1-2. PubMed ID: 10181971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
