189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10125030)
21. GAO wants increases in CMS oversight of nursing homes.
Turnbull GB
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):20-1. PubMed ID: 14703638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. HCFA to step up enforcement of nursing home initiatives in second year; facilities could face tougher scrutiny.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jul; 7(14):1-3. PubMed ID: 10539472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Federal government increases oversight of nursing homes.
Gundling R
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Sep; 53(9):62. PubMed ID: 11066709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New enforcement rules clarify OBRA.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Jan; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 10139442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. GAO: HCFA failed to sanction Calif. nursing homes.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1998 Aug; 28(31):8. PubMed ID: 10183057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Questionable quality initiative. Nursing homes frustrated with CMS measures.
Duff S
Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(20):20-1. PubMed ID: 12048836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Improve your compliance record in 2001.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2000 Dec; 8(26):1-3. PubMed ID: 11291140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medicare and Medicaid programs; provider appeals: technical amendments--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist; 1996 Jun; 61(122):32347-51. PubMed ID: 10158604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Sometimes it pays to appeal survey findings.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Feb; 21(2):69. PubMed ID: 10177553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dealing with due process concerns.
Miles F
Provider; 1995 Mar; 21(3):71-2. PubMed ID: 10140703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. OBRA '87 amendments cause setbacks.
Hegland A
Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Dec; 13(12):38-9, 42-3. PubMed ID: 10108355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Drug distribution and the PaCS survey.
Shor JB
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Jul; 9(7):45-6. PubMed ID: 10280728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Standards of care and sanctions for breaches: the survey process in long-term care.
Chester CF
J Long Term Care Adm; 1989; 17(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 10304017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Groups, feds duel over 'deal'.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1995 Jul; 25(27):5. PubMed ID: 10143781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementing OBRA pushes legal limits.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jun; 13(6):24-5. PubMed ID: 10106732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Beware of citations for violation of activities regulations.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Feb; 9(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11973918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. New inspection proposal shows IOM (Institute of Medicine) influence.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1988 Jan; 11(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10302045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Michigan nursing home group continues to pursue broad challenge of HCFA's survey procedures in federal court despite recent set-back.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Nov; 5(23):1-3. PubMed ID: 10175254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Public policy development for nursing homes.
Holder E
Contemp Longterm Care; 1987 Aug; 10(8):74. PubMed ID: 10283295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. National report calls for more teeth in implementing enforcement remedies.
Weiss HP
Balance; 1999; 3(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 10346527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
