178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10125109)
1. Blue ribbon recipe. Experts share their advice for survey success.
Hegland A
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Apr; 16(4):60, 62, 99. PubMed ID: 10125109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Troubleshooting your care plans. Improving the quality of nutrition care in LTC.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2002 Aug; 18(12):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 12192775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing home quality: current issues and CMS's plans for improvement.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2005 May; 22(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 15913220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nursing home reform: objective regulation or subjective decisions?
Robbins MK
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Jan; (191):9-35. PubMed ID: 10144586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. GAO: HCFA failed to sanction Calif. nursing homes.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1998 Aug; 28(31):8. PubMed ID: 10183057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HCFA cleans up survey procedures.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Feb; 17(2):22. PubMed ID: 10134013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey inconsistencies point to need for better training.
Johnson-Pawlson J
Provider; 1993 Jan; 19(1):60. PubMed ID: 10123207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sometimes it pays to appeal survey findings.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Feb; 21(2):69. PubMed ID: 10177553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole new ballgame--providers prepare for enforcement.
Burgess KL
Provider; 1995 Feb; 21(2):41-2, 44, 46. PubMed ID: 10140828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. More than just paper compliance.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 Aug; 20(8):33. PubMed ID: 10170019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surviving the survey. New process turns up the heat on administrators.
Sullivan JG
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Nov; 18(11):69-70. PubMed ID: 10153600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey and enforcement proposal requires facility attention.
Cook MH; Turner SA
Provider; 1993 Apr; 19(4):48-9. PubMed ID: 10125030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare and Medicaid programs; provider appeals: technical amendments--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist; 1996 Jun; 61(122):32347-51. PubMed ID: 10158604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with due process concerns.
Miles F
Provider; 1995 Mar; 21(3):71-2. PubMed ID: 10140703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proper plan of correction responses.
Hurr WL
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Apr; 16(4):64, 66, 102. PubMed ID: 10125110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How to use the survey process as a facility management tool.
Harkins MJ
Provider; 1988 Apr; 14(4):30, 32, 34. PubMed ID: 10302326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Michigan nursing home group continues to pursue broad challenge of HCFA's survey procedures in federal court despite recent set-back.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Nov; 5(23):1-3. PubMed ID: 10175254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HCFA issues proposed rule for nursing home survey process.
Banach J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Feb; 59(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 10302154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Providers trapped in survey standoff.
Childs N
Provider; 2000 May; 26(5):24-6, 29-30, 33-8. PubMed ID: 11066818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term care plan gets rolling.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1999 May; 25(5):49-50. PubMed ID: 10387601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
