These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10125422)
1. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section. Berkman H Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force. Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 7243111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Error in patient education before delivery--the newest decision of the BGH]. Ulsenheimer K Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jan; 54(1):M20-2. PubMed ID: 8150243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section. Schifrin BS; Cohen WR Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 23206669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does standardization of care through clinical guidelines improve outcomes and reduce medical liability? Kirkpatrick DH; Burkman RT Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1022-6. PubMed ID: 20966684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. L.A. County learns costly lesson on mandated labor guidelines. Jackson R Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1998 Apr; 10(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 10184893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Refusal of blood transfusion for religious reasons]. Ulsenheimer K Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 54(6):M83-6. PubMed ID: 8088483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent. Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cesarean section on the dead and dying patient from the legal viewpoint]. Hanack EW Gynakologe; 1982 Jun; 15(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7117914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [What are the medico-legal implications of induced labor?]. Pierre F; Bardin-Bedu C; Fabre H; Gombau HN; Soutoul JH J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(1 Suppl):120-8. PubMed ID: 8550970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin. Ketler SK Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How lawyers have invaded the delivery room. Huber PW Med Econ; 1992 Dec; 69(23):149, 153-7, 160 passim. PubMed ID: 10122761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [What can we learn from a case of medical malpractice?]. Kato S; Kobayashi H; Makita S; Kuwabara H; Oohira M Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Aug; 106(8):494. PubMed ID: 16119115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The new rules on informed consent. Rice B Med Econ; 2000 Jun; 77(12):150-2, 156-7, 161-2. PubMed ID: 11010472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate markers of healthcare standards. Murphy JF Ir Med J; 2007 Jan; 100(1):324. PubMed ID: 17380918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Obstetrical delivery of small premature infants--are there legal guidelines?]. Ratzel R Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(5):203-4. PubMed ID: 8528957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cesarean section on the dead and dying patient from the physician's viewpoint]. Hiersche HD Gynakologe; 1982 Jun; 15(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7117913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The question of cesarean sections. Lewis RF Wis Med J; 1991 Mar; 90(3):102, 105. PubMed ID: 2058165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]