354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10126149)
1. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
Stevens M
Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities.
Feehan KP
Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
McKinney P
J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assurance--what lies ahead? A Canadian legal respective.
Batty GR
Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):108-12. PubMed ID: 10311238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
George JE; Rouse AR
N J Med; 1987 Jun; 84(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 3475597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection for reporting. Law creating database snuffs fear of litigation.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(31):12. PubMed ID: 16114831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
Mills DH
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
Dollar CJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
Stevens M
Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians.
Nijm LM
J Leg Med; 2003 Dec; 24(4):541-56. PubMed ID: 14660324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review: federal and state protection.
Kennedy KE
Minn Med; 1996 Mar; 79(3):52-4. PubMed ID: 8839070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing professional liability.
Cain M
Nurs N Z; 1998 Sep; 4(8):28. PubMed ID: 10586784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of qui tam to the quality of health care.
Hsia DC
J Leg Med; 1993 Jun; 14(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 8340713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality hospitals: the legal privilege legislation & implications for clinicians.
George PT
Aust Clin Rev; 1990; 10(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 2078152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review complements QI efforts.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance--do you know the legal implications?
Ferguson CG
Dimens Health Serv; 1984 Nov; 61(11):27-8. PubMed ID: 6510586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
Cross LL
Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians in distress.
Goodman RS; London SK
N Y State J Med; 1993 Mar; 93(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 8455855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Enterprise liability. A dangerous quick fix.
Jahnke MD
Mich Med; 1993 Nov; 92(11):16-7. PubMed ID: 8295557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician peer review. Serving the patient or the physician?
Cate MJ
J Leg Med; 1999 Dec; 20(4):479-506. PubMed ID: 10641461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
