These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10126960)

  • 1. Update on Pennsylvania's HC4 and the use of data in marketing hospital services.
    QRC Advis; 1993 Jul; 9(9):1-3, 8. PubMed ID: 10126960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost and quality information and health care market reform.
    Foreman S; Kenkel D; Shea D
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1995; 15():137-53. PubMed ID: 10163094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do quality report cards make a difference? The New York and Pennsylvania experience with releasing physician-specific outcomes.
    O'Rourke LM
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):2-11. PubMed ID: 10130698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The public eye. Published outcomes reports effect change at Pa. hospitals.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Feb; 27(7):140, 155. PubMed ID: 10164589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public report cards--cardiac surgery and beyond.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Nov; 355(18):1847-9. PubMed ID: 17079758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pa. hospitals dispute bypass data.
    Pallarito K
    Mod Healthc; 1994 Dec 19-26; 24(51):19. PubMed ID: 10138897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison-shopping comes to medicine.
    Borfitz D
    Med Econ; 1993 Jun; 70(11):50-4, 57-8, 60. PubMed ID: 10126498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Pennsylvania experiment: DRGs and beyond.
    Schwartz H
    Physicians Manage; 1988 Feb; 28(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 10312398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the behavior of hospital composite performance measures: an example from coronary artery bypass surgery.
    O'Brien SM; DeLong ER; Dokholyan RS; Edwards FH; Peterson ED
    Circulation; 2007 Dec; 116(25):2969-75. PubMed ID: 18056529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's coronary services network: a managed care organization's approach to improving the quality of cardiac care for its members.
    Plogman PL; Pine M; Reed DC; Byrwa KJ; Berman JI
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Dec; 4(12):1679-86. PubMed ID: 10339100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pennsylvania scorecard focuses on quality.
    Harris N
    Bus Health; 1993 Mar; 11(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 10124892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bypass results vary by hospital. Checking up on hospitals and surgeons before bypass surgery may pay off.
    Harv Heart Lett; 2009 Feb; 19(6):1. PubMed ID: 19575517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the effect of hospital charges and quality on choice.
    Luft HS; Garnick DW; Phibbs CS; Peltzman DJ; Lichtenberg E; McPhee SJ
    J Health Care Mark; 1991 Sep; 11(3):2-11. PubMed ID: 10116316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter?
    Dimick JB; Birkmeyer JD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 18722939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uniform billing data in hospital planning, marketing and clinical guidelines.
    Gideon DM; Morehead KE; Petno DC
    Am J Med Qual; 1996; 11(1):S63-5. PubMed ID: 8763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates.
    Guru V; Tu JV; Etchells E; Anderson GM; Naylor CD; Novick RJ; Feindel CM; Rubens FD; Teoh K; Mathur A; Hamilton A; Bonneau D; Cutrara C; Austin PC; Fremes SE
    Circulation; 2008 Jun; 117(23):2969-76. PubMed ID: 18541752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.
    Zacharias A; Schwann TA; Riordan CJ; Durham SJ; Shah A; Papadimos TJ; Engoren M; Habib RH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1961-9. PubMed ID: 15919292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The public dissemination of physician-specific mortality data: who has the right to know?
    Schneidman D
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Aug; 78(8):31-7. PubMed ID: 10127505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perspectives. HCFA's mortality data: what do they say about quality?
    Moskowitz DB
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1994 Oct; 48(42):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10136622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of hospital volume as a measure of quality of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Welke KF; Barnett MJ; Sarrazin MS; Rosenthal GE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 16305854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.