These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10127854)

  • 1. Outcomes data: publishing the right stuff.
    Plume SK
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):20-4. PubMed ID: 10127854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do quality report cards make a difference? The New York and Pennsylvania experience with releasing physician-specific outcomes.
    O'Rourke LM
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):2-11. PubMed ID: 10130698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The public dissemination of physician-specific mortality data: who has the right to know?
    Schneidman D
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Aug; 78(8):31-7. PubMed ID: 10127505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The public interest in publishing quality information.
    Millenson ML
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):25-9. PubMed ID: 10127855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cleveland and Cincinnati: can releasing quality data make friends and influence care?
    O'Rourke LM
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993; 5(6):12-9. PubMed ID: 10127853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principles for the release of physician-specific health care data: balancing the interests of patients and physicians.
    Baker NA; Otten RD
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 10126798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The public eye. Published outcomes reports effect change at Pa. hospitals.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Feb; 27(7):140, 155. PubMed ID: 10164589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital discharge to other healthcare facilities: impact on in-hospital mortality.
    Carey JS; Parker JP; Robertson JM; Misbach GA; Fisher AL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Nov; 197(5):806-12. PubMed ID: 14585418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Report card daze.
    Montague J
    Hosp Health Netw; 1996 Jan; 70(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8541923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumer response to quality information.
    Chernew M; Escarce JJ
    Med Care; 1998 Jul; 36(7):943-4. PubMed ID: 9674612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
    Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates?
    Hannan EL; Wu C; Ryan TJ; Bennett E; Culliford AT; Gold JP; Hartman A; Isom OW; Jones RH; McNeil B; Rose EA; Subramanian VA
    Circulation; 2003 Aug; 108(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 12885743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data briefing. Information for patients.
    Appleby J
    Health Serv J; 2002 Apr; 112(5802):29. PubMed ID: 12004499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card.
    Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB
    Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians.
    Narins CR; Dozier AM; Ling FS; Zareba W
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jan; 165(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 15642879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the risk of coronary surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Weintraub WS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 47(3):669-71. PubMed ID: 16458153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on Pennsylvania's HC4 and the use of data in marketing hospital services.
    QRC Advis; 1993 Jul; 9(9):1-3, 8. PubMed ID: 10126960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes?
    Mack MJ; Herbert M; Prince S; Dewey TM; Magee MJ; Edgerton JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1309-17. PubMed ID: 15942571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. As long as it comes out all right.
    Friedman E
    Healthc Forum J; 1992; 35(4):11-3, 15. PubMed ID: 10119519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.
    Parker JP; Li Z; Damberg CL; Danielsen B; Carlisle DM
    Med Care; 2006 Jul; 44(7):687-95. PubMed ID: 16799364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.