BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1012856)

  • 1. Analysis of superiority of the right visual field in bilateral tachistoscopic word-recognition.
    Fudin R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 pt. 1):683-8. PubMed ID: 1012856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of post-exposural directional scanning and cerebral dominance explanations of lateral differences in trachistoscopic recognition.
    Fudin R; Masterson CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 1272678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superiority of the left cerebral hemisphere in word recognition with nonverbal central fixation.
    Williams SM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):895-8. PubMed ID: 6522202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input.
    McKeever WF; Hulling MD
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 4336397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    McKeever WF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric preference of paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenics.
    Magaro PA; Chamrad DL
    Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Nov; 18(11):1269-85. PubMed ID: 6652163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral-foveal scanning and the identification of heteropalindromes in the visual half-fields.
    Fundin R; Lembessis E; Charles WG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 3503257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lateral asymmetries in visual perception: a review of tachistoscopic visual half-field studies.
    Pirozzolo FJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 1):695-701. PubMed ID: 600617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tachistoscopic recognition of normal and mirror images of Kana and Kanji characters.
    Shimizu A; Endo M; Nakamura I
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1983; 37(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6884915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: evidence from fMRI.
    Hunter ZR; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):316-25. PubMed ID: 17716695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directional scanning or reporting preferences are not the cause of visual hemifield x report interactions.
    Young AW; Ellis AW
    Cortex; 1983 Dec; 19(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 6671392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directional scanning and cerebral asymmetries in processing visual stimuli.
    Aaron PG; Handley AC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):719-25. PubMed ID: 1178354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left-cerebral hemisphere superiority in tachistoscopic word-recognition performances.
    McKeever WF; Huling MD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Jun; 30(3):763-6. PubMed ID: 5429323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right hemisphere superiority in the perception of different kinds of non-verbal material.
    Sobótka S; Grabowska AM
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1985; 34 Suppl():149-52. PubMed ID: 2941785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.