437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10129268)
1. Death by default.
Lindgren J
Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Love and let die.
Painton P; Taylor E
Time; 1990 Mar; 135(12):62-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10104321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance.
Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. When is medical treatment "futile"?
Bennett AJ
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comment. Defining the right to die.
English DM
Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 10129269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1987 developments. National Legal Center Staff.
Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):333-60. PubMed ID: 2967805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "The song of death: the lyrics of euthanasia".
Somerville MA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():1-76. PubMed ID: 10145960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the elderly cancer patient.
Thomasma DC
Clin Geriatr Med; 1987 Aug; 3(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 3308049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
Shuster E
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique.
Gorby JD
Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician-assisted suicide and the Supreme Court: the Washington and Vacco verdicts.
Candilis PJ; Appelbaum KL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 9460047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die.
Berman MB
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health.
Craig P
J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports.
Vaux K
J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Active vs. passive euthanasia: why keep the distinction?
Kamisar Y
Trial; 1993 Mar; 29(3):32-34, 36-38. PubMed ID: 11652688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The case of the coercive family.
Marshall PA; Hartz J; Tan SY
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):135-6; discussion 136-42. PubMed ID: 8032514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1986 developments. National Legal Center Staff.
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):255-76. PubMed ID: 2951349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
