240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10129323)
1. 'Stark II' to cause changes for physicians in ventures.
Crane TS; Steiner J
Mod Healthc; 1993 Oct; 23(41):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10129323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Stark II' limits physicians, but may help hospitals.
Hudson T
Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Oct; 67(20):52. PubMed ID: 8401714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician ownership after the Stark Bill and the Safe Harbors.
Holden SC
Internist; 1992 Feb; 33(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 10118317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Update on hospital-physician relationships under Stark II.
Steiner JE
Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Dec; 47(12):66-8, 70-2, 74-5. PubMed ID: 10145916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical applications of Stark II to hospital operations.
Higgins DB; Hayes ML
Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Dec; 47(12):76-8, 81, 83-5. PubMed ID: 10145917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal issues in physician self-referral and other health care business relationships.
Tedrick S
J Leg Med; 1992 Dec; 13(4):521-61. PubMed ID: 1469331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revised Stark bill still packs enough wallop to slow ventures.
Tokarski C
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jul; 19(29):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10303663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stark reality: new federal law forces changes in hospital/physician contracts.
Gay MM
Ky Hosp Mag; 1994; 12(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10132934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Hanlester Laboratories": HHS joint venture standards remain unclear.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1991 Nov; 8(10):8-11. PubMed ID: 10114943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Stark II' limits physician referrals, but may help hospitals.
Hudson T
Trustee; 1993 Dec; 46(12):20. PubMed ID: 10130692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health care mergers and acquisitions. How new federal laws prohibiting physician self-referrals affect integrated delivery systems.
Homer LC
Healthspan; 1994 Apr; 11(4):21-31. PubMed ID: 10134033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ownership issues blurring the future of imaging centers.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(33):24-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 10119807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The debate over physician ownership of health care facilities.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1989 Jul; 321(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 2664511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legislation advancing in California would outlaw self-referrals.
Taravella S
Mod Healthc; 1992 Feb; 22(6):34. PubMed ID: 10116209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Joint ventures become even riskier.
Azevedo D
Med Econ; 1993 Jul; 70(14):36-8, 41, 44-5. PubMed ID: 10127361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Joint ventures: beyond the safe harbors.
Kadzielski MA
Health Prog; 1989 May; 70(4):70, 77. PubMed ID: 10292848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Despite some overlap, ethical and legal issues of physician self-referral remain distinct.
Randall T
JAMA; 1991 Nov; 266(17):2335. PubMed ID: 1920735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New test? Hanlester decision clamps down on MD ventures.
Hudson T
Hospitals; 1992 Jul; 66(14):24, 26. PubMed ID: 1634213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing environment redefines joint ventures.
Health Syst Rev; 1993; 26(3):suppl 1-11. PubMed ID: 10125955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Would patient care be better served if there were greater government regulation of physicians' financial arrangements? No: a rational view of joint ventures.
Caldwell JK
Internist; 1992 Feb; 33(2):13-5. PubMed ID: 10118316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
