235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10130118)
1. Getting the most out of your old LIS (laboratory information system).
Winsten D
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Nov; 25(11):52-3. PubMed ID: 10130118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validating your laboratory information system.
Scott C; Hengesbaugh JH
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Aug; 30(8):32-4, 36-40. PubMed ID: 10185544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sifting through the data to find the best LIS.
O'Brien JA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Jan; 33(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11211417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to tell when it's time to replace your laboratory computer.
Stadler SL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Mar; 24(3):47-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10117431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-tracking system enhances clinical laboratory efficiency.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1999 Jan; 3(1):6-9, 1. PubMed ID: 10387193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Good Automated Laboratory Practices and other standards: validation of computer systems in the PC environment.
Nitahara K
Qual Assur; 1993; 2(1-2):96-101. PubMed ID: 8156229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structuring your RFI and RFP for an objective LIS evaluation.
Mills BD
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Oct; 23(10):71-3. PubMed ID: 10114612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Receiving is believing.
Foster K; Wooster G
Health Manag Technol; 2006 Nov; 27(11):34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 17128741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. LIS shake-out.
Rogoski RR
Health Manag Technol; 2001 Jun; 22(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 11409273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrate the LIS for the lab's future.
Rogoski RR
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Jan; 43(1):32, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 21309352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. LIS--connecting the pieces. When it comes to laboratory information systems, the debate is between interoperability and best of breed.
Lawrence D
Healthc Inform; 2008 Nov; 25(11):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 19024073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Avoiding Y2Kaos.
Lafler DJ; Lafler KP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Dec; 30(12):14-7, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 10339257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ways to avoid snafus while implementing a laboratory information system.
Hengesbaugh JH
Healthc Inform; 1993 Mar; 10(3):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10124535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automating anatomic pathology. Implementing an AP solution that integrates with your hospital's LIS can improve workflow and productivity.
Tuthill M
Health Manag Technol; 2008 Mar; 29(3):18, 20. PubMed ID: 18380239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The regionalization of laboratory services. Part 1.
Steiner JW; Root JM; Buck E
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Jun; 26(6):22-9. PubMed ID: 10171880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed HCFA lab rules: the changing face for LIS.
Winsten D
Comput Healthc; 1990 Sep; 11(9):51, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10107933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ten technologies that promise efficiency in the clinical lab.
Vanderslice L; Winsten D
Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):52-4, 56, 58. PubMed ID: 10120842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical computing standards ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) Committee E-31. A review of published standards and current projects February, 1992.
Megargle R
J Clin Comput; 1991-1992; 20(3-4):115-65. PubMed ID: 10183664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Information system issues facing clinical laboratories serving complex integrated delivery systems.
Henricks WH
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2000; 14(3):55-67. PubMed ID: 11186799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Making it work: planning and executing a successful LIS installation.
Winsten D; McMahan J; Gross G; Petrocelly J
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11392698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
