BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10131516)

  • 1. Deriving INRs (international normalized ratios) with customized tables.
    Thornbery JM
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Jan; 26(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 10131516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refining and using Lotus 1-2-3, Part 2. Using Lotus 1-2-3 to assist with indicator monitors.
    Dalto M
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Aug; 25(8):73-5. PubMed ID: 10127790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating LIS turnaround times with Lotus 1-2-3.
    Scheele K
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Sep; 21(9):73-5. PubMed ID: 10295657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excellence of care in rural America: the LIS contribution.
    Patten GE
    Healthc Inform; 1995 Aug; 12(8):64, 66. PubMed ID: 10144353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center.
    Dighe AS; Rao A; Coakley AB; Lewandrowski KB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):758-64. PubMed ID: 16707379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The ideal form of laboratory information management].
    Kataoka H; Sugiura T
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jan; 53(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 15724489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taking the 'byte' out of method evaluation number crunching.
    Walsh DJ
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 Apr; 23(4):65-7. PubMed ID: 10110454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Less variation in laboratory results after the introduction of INR. Differences between hospital laboratories and laboratories within primary health care are levelled out].
    Hillarp A; Egberg N; Fagerberg I; Lindahl TL; Nordin G; Stigendal L
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(50):5068-70, 5073-4. PubMed ID: 12572298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of INRs after local calibration of thromboplastin international sensitivity indexes.
    McGlasson DL
    Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 15(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 12776770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the laboratory information system (LIS) with special reference to the microbiology laboratory.
    Desikan P; Koram MR; Trivedi SK; Jain A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 48(3):418. PubMed ID: 16761776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinically relevant differences in prothrombin time and INR values related to blood sample collection in plastic vs glass tubes.
    Fiebig EW; Etzell JE; Ng VL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 16416740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. We carved out bar coding goals--and reached them.
    Sehloff JA
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Feb; 25(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 10124013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Methods for information system in laboratory medicine--present and future].
    Okada M; Yakata M
    Rinsho Byori; 1990 Jan; Spec No 83():152-8. PubMed ID: 2319707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Studying critical values: adverse event identification following a critical laboratory values study at the ohio state university medical center.
    Jenkins JJ; Mac Crawford J; Bissell MG
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Oct; 128(4):604-9. PubMed ID: 17875512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a multirule, multistage quality control program in a clinical laboratory computer system.
    Eggert AA; Westgard JO; Barry PL; Emmerich KA
    J Med Syst; 1987 Dec; 11(6):391-411. PubMed ID: 3451939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. America's 10 most computer advanced laboratories.
    Healthc Inform; 1993 Sep; 10(9):37-41. PubMed ID: 10128253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A concept of normal range: what should we do to get clinically useful normal range?].
    Usui T
    Rinsho Byori; 1990 Apr; Spec No 84():31-8. PubMed ID: 2362362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. America's 10 most computer advanced laboratories.
    Healthc Inform; 1994 Aug; 11(8):53-7. PubMed ID: 10136638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Descriptive analytical data and consequences for calculation of common reference intervals in the Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000.
    Rustad P; Felding P; Lahti A; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):343-70. PubMed ID: 15223700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting technically incorrect information.
    Weber LJ; Bissell MG
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 12046272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.