404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10131599)
21. The surgical gowns and drapes of tomorrow. Specifying material performance and test methods.
Patel SR; Urech D; Werner HP
Med Device Technol; 1998 Sep; 9(7):50-1. PubMed ID: 10186984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Guidelines for the choice of disposable and reusable medical equipment. The Hospital Infection Control Group of Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 2():S132. PubMed ID: 7561591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reusables may slow rising tide of laparoscopic surgery costs.
Souhrada L
Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Feb; 2(2):22. PubMed ID: 10171424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Cost comparison of the use of textile surgical covers and disposable surgical covers in Mainz University Clinics].
Rörig R
Unfallchirurgie; 1982 Dec; 8(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 7164194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
Muscarella LF
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Re-using 'single-use' medical devices.
Dunn JP
N Z Med J; 2000 Oct; 113(1120):452. PubMed ID: 11194773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic instruments good outsourcing candidates.
Whittington S; Vasey N
Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jun; 22(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10173016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Source reduction and the disposables vs. reusables debate.
Belkin NL
Regul Anal Med Waste; 1993 Jun; 1(9):6-11. PubMed ID: 10132846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. ST65: supporting quality in reusable textile reprocessing.
Putnam E
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 11098390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advantages of reusable accessories.
Wolfsen HC
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 10683220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Device reprocessing makes inroads in ASCs.
DeJohn P
OR Manager; 2009 May; 25(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 19517927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A review of single-use and reusable gowns and drapes in health care.
Rutala WA; Weber DJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 22(4):248-57. PubMed ID: 11379716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trocar talk.
Souhrada L
Mater Manag Health Care; 1996 Nov; 5(11):48-50. PubMed ID: 10172810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"].
Engert K
Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. "Single use only": obfuscation or the necessary attainment of zero risk?
Whitby RM; Looke DF
Med J Aust; 1997 Nov; 167(10):519-20. PubMed ID: 9397037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reusable sterile surgical packs give hospitals convenience at a low cost.
Weller C
Text Rent; 1989 Sep; 73(1):74-6, 79. PubMed ID: 10295757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reach the bottom line on reuse. Weights and balances.
Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):40, 42. PubMed ID: 10167495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
