223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10132602)
1. States rebel against Federal abortion orders.
Kent C; Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 2 states sued for not paying for abortions for poor.
Denniston L
Sun; 1994 Apr; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12288300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Hyde Amendment and the future.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
Nestor B; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High court urged to reject Colorado appeal of finding that it must fund rape and incest survivors' abortions.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Nov; 4(20):2. PubMed ID: 12320281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Senate, 59-40, defeats move to strike limits on Medicaid abortion coverage.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (15):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.
Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F
Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent developments in the health care area.
Harper TD; Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Sep; 69(9):785-7. PubMed ID: 7191438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Controversy over abortion funding increases.
Hosp Prog; 1980 Mar; 61(3):32. PubMed ID: 10297698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 80 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal; 70 percent approve Medicaid Funding.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 383496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.
Gold RB; Nestor B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3884361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. District of Columbia money bill faces last-minute antiabortion challenge.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (16):1-2. PubMed ID: 12318480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
