These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Retinal area specificity in the McCollough effect: the role of fixation points. Murch GM Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1980; 27(3):500-8. PubMed ID: 7434829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The indirect McCollough effect: an examination of an associative account. Humphrey GK; Herbert AM; Hazlewood S; Stewart JA Percept Psychophys; 1998 Oct; 60(7):1188-96. PubMed ID: 9821780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. McCollough effect acquisition depends on duration of exposure to inducing stimuli, not number of stimulus presentations. Skowbo D; White K Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):549-51. PubMed ID: 6664810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Contingent aftereffects distinguish conscious and preconscious color processing. Vul E; MacLeod DI Nat Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 9(7):873-4. PubMed ID: 16767088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Luminance as a parameter in establishment and testing of the McCollough effect. White KD Vision Res; 1976; 16(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 1266074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Contingency and the McCollough effect. Siegel S; Allan LG Percept Psychophys; 1987 Sep; 42(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 3671054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comments on the use of perceptually ambiguous figures as McCollough-effect stimuli. Broerse J; Crassini B Percept Psychophys; 1981 Oct; 30(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 7322821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Practice does not facilitate acquisition of McCollough effects: evidence against a learning model. Skowbo D; Rich J Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):551-4. PubMed ID: 7167353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Does testing initiate decay of McCollough effects? Skowbo D; Garrity S; Michaud L Percept Psychophys; 1985 Apr; 37(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 4034356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The VVIQ imagery-induced McCollough effects: an alternative analysis. Harris JP Percept Psychophys; 1982 Sep; 32(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 7177768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Further evidence against the classical conditioning model of McCollough effects. Skowbo D; Forster T Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 6664811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Contour-contingent color aftereffects: retinal area specificity. Stromeyer CF Am J Psychol; 1972 Jun; 85(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 5040618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Individual differences in McCollough effects: a study of twins. Skowbo D; Michaud L Percept Psychophys; 1985 Sep; 38(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 3871080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Global orientation aftereffect in multi-attribute displays: implications for the binding problem. Poirier FJ; Frost BJ Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 15610753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]