These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10133503)

  • 21. Advocacy for legal reform for safe abortion.
    Ashenafi M
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2004 Apr; 8(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15487618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Court's abortion decision likely to affect all Medicaid patients.
    Am Med News; 1980 Jul; 23(27):1, 7. PubMed ID: 10324767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Insured women and payment for elective abortion.
    Lee JA; Afable-Munsuz A; Van Bebber SL; Phillips KA
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 18468919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion: cash choice.
    Lieberman S
    Health PAC Bull; 1977; (78):15-6. PubMed ID: 10305212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Federal financial participation in state claims for abortions.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Feb; 43(23):4571-82. PubMed ID: 10236701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Restricted abortion funding approved.
    Stoltz MK
    Health Care Week; 1978 Oct; 2(16):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10324744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. La. abortion law puts funding in jeopardy.
    Lutz S
    Mod Healthc; 1994 Aug; 24(34):13. PubMed ID: 10135676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare--abortions: final regulation.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61597-8. PubMed ID: 10297597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1895-915. PubMed ID: 10288539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The fiscal impact of the Medicaid abortion funding ban in Michigan.
    Kolchin R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):479. PubMed ID: 8127548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sterilizations and abortions--federal financial participation: final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(217):52145-75. PubMed ID: 10297259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Abortion providers bounce back.
    Carney EN
    Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.
    Fried MG
    Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stark plan enters muddled reform path.
    Wagner L; Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1994 Mar; 24(11):2. PubMed ID: 10132302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion in the United States: barriers to access.
    Fried MG
    Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):174-94. PubMed ID: 10796974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Amniocentesis for sex identification.
    Bergner L
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Feb; 302(9):525. PubMed ID: 7351994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Abortion a business hurdle for nation's Catholic hospitals.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Aug; 19(34):40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 10294510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Malpractice lawyers' new target.
    Lewin T
    Med Econ; 1995 Jun; 72(12):53-6, 59, 62. PubMed ID: 10154669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion dilemma.
    Mazzei M
    Aust Nurs J; 2009 Mar; 16(8):3. PubMed ID: 19408435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.