These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10133587)

  • 21. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speak out for reproductive rights.
    Gonzalez-Pardo L
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1992; 47(3):67. PubMed ID: 1624662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abortion and the full humanity of women: nearly there.
    Wainer J
    Sex Health; 2007 Dec; 4(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 18200757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Access to abortion in the USA-the legal battle.
    Cleaver G
    Lancet; 2017 Jun; 389(10087):2361-2362. PubMed ID: 28635601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Court stands by abortion.
    Press A; Camper D
    Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rust corrodes: the First Amendment implications of Rust v. Sullivan.
    Fitzpatrick M
    Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 45(1):185-227. PubMed ID: 10183813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
    Shore BD
    J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Pevsner WJ
    MedGenMed; 2007 Aug; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18092047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment.
    Westfall D
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ANA opposes Bush gag rule memo.
    deVries CM
    Am Nurse; 1992 May; 24(5):3. PubMed ID: 1595971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Nordholm S
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The abortion debate thirty years later: from choice to coercion.
    Kramlich M
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):783-804. PubMed ID: 16700122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S; Wyatt J
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker & Hurwitz in the dock & defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Jun; (314):9-38. PubMed ID: 16173382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.