These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1013433)

  • 41. [Immediate effects of a cervico-uterine cancer control program on morbidity in the IX region of Araucanía].
    Capurro I; Rojo J; Jorquera J; Dabancens A
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1988; 53(6):321-4. PubMed ID: 3153096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
    Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
    Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Every encounter is an opportunity for recommending breast and cervical cancer screening in women. Alaska Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Alaska Med; 2000; 42(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 10916858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cervical cancer screening program.
    Landrum JM; Schoenbucher AK
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1971 Oct; 60(10):339-41. PubMed ID: 5118318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
    Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
    Wain GV; Hacker NF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, October 31, 1991-September 30, 1993.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1994 Jul; 43(29):530-4. PubMed ID: 8028574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Cervical cancer and mass screening].
    Hakama M
    Duodecim; 1970; 86(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 5421372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
    Campion J; Flamant R
    Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: selected states, 2003 to 2004.
    Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Subramanian S; Tangka FK; Bapat B; Richardson LC
    Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):626-35. PubMed ID: 18157831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical impact of quality assurance in an organized cervical screening program.
    Andrae B; Smith P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 May; 78(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 10326890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Can we do the same in the developing world?
    Bermudez A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S192-6. PubMed ID: 16168466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
    Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Prophylaxis and early detection of cervix carcinoma].
    Held E
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1970 Jul; 59(28):1021-9. PubMed ID: 5512823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The effect of various factors on participation in cytologic screening in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
    Kavungu P; Ebeling K; Ebert S
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1983; 77(21):883-5. PubMed ID: 6659584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [A national population-based screening program for cervical cancer in Israel, need for re-evaluation].
    Benshushan A; Antebi SO
    Harefuah; 2000 Sep; 139(5-6):217-20. PubMed ID: 11062956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
    Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
    Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Biostatistical analysis of the program of control of cervicouterine carcinoma].
    Cubillos J; Basaure C; Franck C
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 42(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 613385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Cervico-uterine cancer in southern Chile].
    Caorsi I; Norambuena L
    Bol Oficina Sanit Panam; 1976 Jan; 80(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 129144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.