These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1013437)

  • 21. Disparities in cervical cancer screening, treatment and outcomes.
    Hicks ML; Yap OW; Matthews R; Parham G
    Ethn Dis; 2006; 16(2 Suppl 3):S3-63-6. PubMed ID: 16774026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Vaginal smears in cytologic cancer screening].
    Takahashi M
    Rinsho Byori; 1965 Oct; 13(10):536-41. PubMed ID: 5894846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Rasaiah B
    CMAJ; 1992 Apr; 146(8):1279-80; author reply 1280, 1284-5. PubMed ID: 1622496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening for cervical cancer. Canadian programmatic guidelines.
    Parboosingh J
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Feb; 45():383-93. PubMed ID: 10065312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of the RACGP in cervical screening.
    Jones B
    Aust Fam Physician; 1992 Dec; 21(12):1717-8. PubMed ID: 1476501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mass cervical cancer screening program by irrigation smear in Japan.
    Kawashima Y; Ino S; Tashiro K; Tachibana M; Masukawa T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Jul; 32(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 5742086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Experiences and results of cancer prevention examinations in an industrial out-patient clinic].
    Wagner S
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1969 Feb; 63(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 5785466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Analysis of the control program of cervicouterine cancer in the southern region of Santiago-Chile, 1974].
    Morales E; Soto R; Dueñas J
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1976; 41(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 1013431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Controversy brews over cervical cancer screening.
    Healthc Demand Dis Manag; 1998 Feb; 4(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 10178013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Making the service suit the patient.
    Smail J; Smail S
    Nurs Times; 1989 Feb 22-28; 85(8):49-51. PubMed ID: 2928239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening and prevention: cervical cancer.
    Weinstein LC; Buchanan EM; Hillson C; Chambers CV
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):559-74. PubMed ID: 19616155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Should cervical cancer screening undergo some changes?].
    Boulanger JC
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009; 37(7-8):669-70. PubMed ID: 19577944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Results of the program of detection of cervicouterine cancer during the year of 1973].
    Arízaga Cruz JM; Cigala Cano JL; García Conzález J; Castro EA; Mendoza E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1975 Aug; 38(226):139-44. PubMed ID: 1175988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical cancer prevention for all Canadians.
    Sellors JW
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Feb; 45():245-7, 252-4. PubMed ID: 10065291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
    Ferriman A
    BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Pap smear.
    Colyar MR
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Jul; 10(7):22. PubMed ID: 12420546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Planning of national cytologic cervical cancer detection in Sweden.
    Ringertz N
    Acta Cytol; 1969 Mar; 13(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 5253717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.