299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10134763)
1. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers.
Brown LC
Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting hospital records from discovery.
Ropiequet JL
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10129389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
Peterson RN
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future for peer review. Florida's constitutional amendment chills quality community.
Glabman M
Trustee; 2005 Apr; 58(4):6-10, 12, 1. PubMed ID: 15881498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review: a secret affair?
Dunn LJ
Trustee; 1978 Apr; 31(4):9-11, 13. PubMed ID: 10307158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to protect confidentiality during the contracting process.
Mishek MG; Whitmore MR; Blazevic DJ
QRC Advis; 1995 Feb; 11(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10140293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New ruling in NC affirms peer review privacy.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):153-4. PubMed ID: 10621281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course?
Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W
Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities.
Feehan KP
Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from discovery in litigation.
Smart CM
Mo Med; 1998 May; 95(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 9604664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal review: coping with celebrity patients.
Roach WH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Nov; 12(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 10114767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
Dollar CJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy.
Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protect yourself by protecting the privacy of your patients.
Folio M
Manag Care; 1996 May; 5(5):47-8, 51-2. PubMed ID: 10159062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Courts beginning to address confidentiality of physicians' credentialing records.
Dawson JS
Healthspan; 1994 Jun; 11(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 10135152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
Mills DH
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What's new with peer review?
Morrow JA
Mo Med; 1995 Dec; 92(12):723-6. PubMed ID: 8587563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Professional Standards Review Organization: some problems of confidentiality.
Springer EW
Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):361-80. PubMed ID: 11658319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting the confidentiality of peer review information.
McCann RW
J AHIMA; 1993 Dec; 64(12):52-6; quiz 57-8. PubMed ID: 10130489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
