These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10134806)

  • 1. The constitutional law of abortion in Germany: should Americans pay attention?
    Kommers DP
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():1-32. PubMed ID: 10134806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
    Alvare H;
    Origins; 1992 Apr; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note.
    Glenn HP
    McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The convergence of abortion regulation in Germany and the United States: a critique of Glendon's Rights Talk thesis.
    Werner U
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1996 Jun; 18(3):571-602. PubMed ID: 11936151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution.
    Allen AL
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1995; 18(21):419-55. PubMed ID: 11656571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
    Carter SL
    Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The politics of abortion.
    Gearty C
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unraveling compromise.
    Olsen F
    Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
    Lindholm LM
    Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany.
    Hertberg BL
    Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
    Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.