206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10135422)
1. Federal court's decisions will clarify the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Brown LC; Penner IE
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 10135422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA).
Wecht CH
Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy versus public access.
Heffernan M
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Apr; 84(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 8826636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: National Practitioner Data Bank.
Pallesen KS
Nebr Med J; 1991 Nov; 76(11):353-72. PubMed ID: 1784317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
Donovan RE
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional rights versus malpractice insurance settlements.
Trentalance AE
Physician Exec; 1994 Aug; 20(8):7-9. PubMed ID: 10139374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Pugsley SC
Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
Cassidy MA
Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
Acevedo LJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of care and the National Practitioner Data Bank: are the two related?
Bartholomew LA
J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 15318429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing Federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity.
Snelson EA
J Med Assoc Ga; 1992 Sep; 81(9):495-7. PubMed ID: 1402428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. National Practitioner Data Bank.
Robb J
N Y State J Med; 1992 Jan; 92(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 1574224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Observations on the National Practitioner Data Bank.
Fernandez H; Munoz F
N Y State J Med; 1992 Jan; 92(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 1574223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Practitioner Data Bank. What surgeons should know.
Schneidman L
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1990 Oct; 75(10):14-8. PubMed ID: 10107295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physicians under surveillance. The National Practitioner Data Bank.
Snelson EA
Minn Med; 1993 Mar; 76(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 8455522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical malpractice claims and quality improvement program as viewed by a forensic pathologist.
Noguchi TT
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2002 Sep; 56(2-3):205-18. PubMed ID: 12415828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality improvement act gets first antitrust test.
Barnes CE
Physician Exec; 1990; 16(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10113358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Civil money penalties for failure to report on medical malpractice payments and for breaching the confidentiality of information--HHS. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(120):28488-94. PubMed ID: 10112218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
