These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10136382)
21. Irrational and pregnant. Rich BA Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 1445547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Psychosurgery: the rights of patients. Plamondon AL Loyola Law Rev; 1977; 23(4):1007-28. PubMed ID: 11664912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions? Zenoff EH; Zients AB George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Mental patients' ability to pursue civil liability claims against health care providers. Meyer RA Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 34(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 11659088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. When does a patient have the right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment? Nathanson JA CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(8):1323-6. PubMed ID: 8162557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs. Cort RS UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Rights of the mentally handicapped: which way in the 1980s? Friedman PR Trial; 1981 Feb; 17(2):43-46, 60-61. PubMed ID: 11651746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Working in the "cuckoo's nest": an essay on recent changes in mental health law and the changing role of psychiatrists in relation to patient and society. Arons BS Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1977; 9(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11664909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The surgical oncology patient: provider obligations and legal rights. Waller DB Nurs Clin North Am; 2001 Sep; 36(3):617-23, xii. PubMed ID: 11532674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Behavior modification: legal limitations on methods and goals. Moya CB; Achtenberg R Notre Dame Lawyer; 1974 Dec; 50(2):230-50. PubMed ID: 11664385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. For these doctors and patients, health means "personal best". Grandinetti D Med Econ; 1998 Sep; 75(18):82-4, 87, 91-5. PubMed ID: 10185531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The synergistic relationship between health and human rights: a case study using female genital mutilation. Moore K; Randolph K; Toubia N; Kirberger E Health Hum Rights; 1997; 2(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 10381834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz. Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy. Brooks AD Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Care of the dying: the doctor and euthanasia. Rizzo R; Yonder J Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):253-68. PubMed ID: 11662104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Power, professionals, and arguments against civil commitment. Page S Prof Psychol; 1975 Nov; 6(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 11664528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]