119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10136470)
1. Ohio doc with ties to Caremark faces kickback charges.
Burns J
Mod Healthc; 1994 Sep; 24(39):14. PubMed ID: 10136470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Caremark faces kickback charges.
Burns J
Mod Healthc; 1994 Aug; 24(32):4. PubMed ID: 10135386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HIV specialist faces trial on kickback allegations.
AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Dec; 10(22):9. PubMed ID: 11362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Caremark, feds meet in attempt to settle charges.
Burns J
Mod Healthc; 1995 Jan; 25(2):9, 16. PubMed ID: 10139201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Another Caremark exec faces charges.
Shriver K
Mod Healthc; 1995 Jul; 25(29):14. PubMed ID: 10144036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Anti-kickback law extends to marketers.
Burgess K
Provider; 1996 Oct; 22(10):55-6. PubMed ID: 10166314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court gets tough on kickback charges. Upholds convictions of K.C. defendants and supports 'one-purpose' rule.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jun; 31(26):7. PubMed ID: 11447648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Erlanger settles for $40 million. Tenn. system faced federal kickback charges.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(44):12-3. PubMed ID: 16300205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What price referrals? The ethical challenge for home care.
Fishman L
Caring; 1989 Mar; 8(3):20-3. PubMed ID: 10292352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Home health agencies, physicians, and referral problems.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 10303383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Baptist probe escalates. Unindicted co-conspirators named in kickback case.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1998 Sep; 28(36):8. PubMed ID: 10185565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New action in Caremark cases.
Shriver K
Mod Healthc; 1996 Jan; 26(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 10154144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HHS publishes long-awaited fraud and abuse anti-kickback regulations.
Weissburg C; Conn LC
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 10303427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Calif. hospital pays feds $50,000 to settle kickback charges.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1992 Jun; 22(26):5. PubMed ID: 10118674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Anti-kickback trend accelerates.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1988 Oct; 29(19):25-6. PubMed ID: 10302906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HHS issues revised anti-kickback rules.
Tokarski C
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(4):6. PubMed ID: 10324917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HHCA (Home Health Corporation of America) execs charged. 3 allegedly paid kickbacks for referrals.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(19):34. PubMed ID: 12038160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CMS issues reporting rule for home health referrals.
McGinty C; Herron S
GHA Today; 2003 Jan; 47(1):3. PubMed ID: 12658958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. Lawmakers block that kickback.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Apr; 43(13):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10303316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Case could alter scope of kickback definition.
Bellandi D
Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(25):2-3. PubMed ID: 10167939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
