These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10136484)
1. Ruling in Kaiser case supports HMOs' right to withhold care. Kertesz L Mod Healthc; 1994 Sep; 24(39):30. PubMed ID: 10136484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Liability avenues increase for HMOs. Lev ER; Campbell PJ J Med Pract Manage; 1998; 14(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 10662079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kaiser going consumer-driven. Largest HMO gearing up for HSAs, expansion. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2006 Aug; 36(32):12-3. PubMed ID: 16958274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Managed care under siege. Despite some legal victories, HMOs face other battles in fighting right-to-sue lawsuits. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2000 Jul; 30(28):34, 39. PubMed ID: 11184158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HMOs and vicarious liability. Implying control over physicians may expose HMOs. Bohm DA QRC Advis; 1999 Jun; 15(8):1-7. PubMed ID: 10537394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When HMOs can't say 'No,' physicians may have to. Diamond F Manag Care; 2001 Aug; 10(8):26-31, 35. PubMed ID: 11565380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Marketplace. Recent losses in liability lawsuits portend problems for HMOs. Moskowitz DB Med Health; 1998 Nov; 52(44):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10187176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HMOs' federal mandate may face legal challenge. Mod Healthc; 1980 Jun; 10(6):38. PubMed ID: 10247371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Meeting part way. A consensus (of sorts) on new health care reforms in California. Panel discussion. Dauner CD; Lee P; Lewin J; Gellert J; Zelman W Healthplan; 2000; 41(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11067359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The PPO advantage. Zalta E Med Interface; 1996 Sep; 9(9):66-7, 71. PubMed ID: 10161522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lawsuit looms over HMOs' home-care responsibilities. Lutz S Mod Healthc; 1991 Feb; 21(7):10. PubMed ID: 10109158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In N.J., it's the HMOs going for a knockout. Becker C Mod Healthc; 2000 Jul; 30(27):10, 12. PubMed ID: 11184145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Main event: HMOs vs. regulators. California scuffle reflects national battle over record fines, more oversight. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2001 Dec; 31(51):22-3. PubMed ID: 11808049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Marketplace. State lawmakers consider keeping HMOs in line through malpractice suits. Moskowitz DB Med Health; 1998 Feb; 52(6):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10176439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspectives. California task force favors modest measures. Strickland D Med Health; 1997 Dec; 51(49):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10182602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court lets HMOs off the hook. Rice B Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):14, 16. PubMed ID: 15357171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The people vs HMOs. Howe RF Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacists in California HMOs gain expanded role. Wittenburg AS Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Dec; 51(23):2890, 2893. PubMed ID: 7879799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doctors, HMOs, ERISA, and the public interest after Pegram v. Hendrich. Stempel JW; von Magdenko N Tort Insur Law J; 2001; 36(3):687-734. PubMed ID: 11939225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Managed care organizations: fiscal responsibility vs. direct liability. Fox v. Health Net of California. Roeder KH Ga Hosp Today; 1994 Apr; 38(4):3. PubMed ID: 10184464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]