241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10136668)
1. Retiree medical--round 2.
Yamamoto DH
Benefits Q; 1994; 10(3):20-5. PubMed ID: 10136668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reassessing retiree benefits: the new challenge.
Kann RH; Turner DE
Empl Benefits J; 1993 Mar; 18(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 10124132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Between a rock and a hard place: understanding the employer mind-set.
Galvin RS; Delbanco S
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):1548-55. PubMed ID: 17102179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data watch. Paying for retiree health care.
Bus Health; 1992 Nov; 10(13):16-7. PubMed ID: 10122470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. For most employers, cost sharing solves some problems of retiree benefits costs.
Bus Health; 1993 Jul; 11(8):18. PubMed ID: 10127517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Facing deadline, businesses shifting more costs to retirees.
Mandelker J
Bus Health; 1993 Mar; 11(3):18-20, 22-4. PubMed ID: 10124592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The maintenance, funding and modification of retiree medical benefits.
Melbinger MS; Culver MW
Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):2-10. PubMed ID: 10121263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Will retiree health benefits survive FAS 106?
Coulter CH
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(4):58-60. PubMed ID: 10127416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The retiree health care question: to prefund or not to prefund?
Stockton RB
Bus Health; 1992 Apr; 10(5):36-7, 40-1. PubMed ID: 10117929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Employer strategies for modifying or terminating retiree benefits in the 1990s.
Gordon JA; Hunsaker KA
Employee Relat Law J; 1992-1993 Winter; 18(3):413-35. PubMed ID: 10123980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision time for retiree medical accounting.
LaBombarde AR
Benefits Q; 1991; 7(3):70-4. PubMed ID: 10117174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early SFAS 106 adopters provide revealing healthcare data.
Leauby BA; Ugras JY; Welsh MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Jun; 47(6):98, 100, 102 passim. PubMed ID: 10145830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The benefits squeeze. Surveys find more cost-shifting, cuts in coverage.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Sep; 35(38):20, 22. PubMed ID: 16229448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Living with GASB 45: how to manage liabilities associated with retiree medical benefits.
Thoen F; Wade D
Benefits Q; 2008; 24(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 18543832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Workers shoulder more health care costs.
Battagliola M
Bus Health; 1994 Nov; 12(11):31-2, 34-6. PubMed ID: 10138532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What should be done now with retiree health benefit prefunding?
Morris FH
Empl Benefits J; 1993 Dec; 18(4):9-10, 14. PubMed ID: 10130544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public sector retirement systems: what does the future hold?
Fornia WB
Empl Benefits J; 2003 Jun; 28(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 12800307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Account-based retiree medical plans: what's good for your pension plan may be good for your retiree medical plan.
Ruschau WJ
Empl Benefits J; 2001 Sep; 26(3):39-40. PubMed ID: 11534221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Clinton's health benefit package compares to today's employer-sponsored plans.
Gabel JR; Liston DC; Jensen GA
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):13-27. PubMed ID: 10132591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Providers seek to rein in retiree health costs.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1993 Jan; 23(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 10123681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
