162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10136854)
1. Development of patient satisfaction questionnaires: I. Methodological issues.
Bamford C; Jacoby A
Qual Health Care; 1992 Sep; 1(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 10136854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient satisfaction surveys as a market research tool for general practices.
Khayat K; Salter B
Br J Gen Pract; 1994 May; 44(382):215-9. PubMed ID: 8204335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.
Ramsay J; Campbell JL; Schroter S; Green J; Roland M
Fam Pract; 2000 Oct; 17(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 11021894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring patient satisfaction: a test of construct validity.
Baker R; Whitfield M
Qual Health Care; 1992 Jun; 1(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 10172105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with their general practice.
Baker R
Fam Pract; 1991 Jun; 8(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 1874365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.
Grogan S; Conner M; Norman P; Willits D; Porter I
Qual Health Care; 2000 Dec; 9(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 11101705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The costs and benefits of asking patients for their opinions about general practice.
Hearnshaw H; Baker R; Cooper A; Eccles M; Soper J
Fam Pract; 1996 Feb; 13(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 8671104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales: an instrument for quality assessments of nursing care.
Thomas LH; McColl E; Priest J; Bond S; Boys RJ
Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 10158594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity.
Poulton BC
Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jan; 46(402):26-31. PubMed ID: 8745848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Day surgery; development of a questionnaire for eliciting patients' experiences.
Black N; Sanderson C
Qual Health Care; 1993 Sep; 2(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 10171774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits.
Stange KC; Zyzanski SJ; Smith TF; Kelly R; Langa DM; Flocke SA; Jaén CR
Med Care; 1998 Jun; 36(6):851-67. PubMed ID: 9630127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ['Consumer quality'-index 'General practice care' measures patients' experiences and compares general practices with each other].
Meuwissen LE; de Bakker DH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A180. PubMed ID: 19900331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of patient satisfaction with family practice care in Slovenia.
Kersnik J
Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Apr; 12(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10830671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Patient Experiences Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours Care (PEQ-OHC): data quality, reliability, and validity.
Garratt AM; Danielsen K; Forland O; Hunskaar S
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2010 Jun; 28(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 20433404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care.
Ryan M; McIntosh E; Shackley P
Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 7(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 9683097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial.
Desborough JA; Butters P; Bhattacharya D; Holland RC; Wright DJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Jun; 8():42. PubMed ID: 18588670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire.
McKinley RK; Manku-Scott T; Hastings AM; French DP; Baker R
BMJ; 1997 Jan; 314(7075):193-8. PubMed ID: 9022436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the work of medical audit advisory groups in promoting audit in general practice.
Baker R; Hearnshaw H; Cooper A; Cheater F; Robertson N
Qual Health Care; 1995 Dec; 4(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 10156391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.
Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Murray D; Carr A
Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10158596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Promoting audit in primary care: roles and relationships of medical audit advisory groups and their managers.
Humphrey C; Berrow D
Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 10161268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
