186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10138422)
1. Single payer: do government-run programs meet America's needs?
Jones WR
Benefits Q; 1994; 10(4):13-20. PubMed ID: 10138422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. America's first single payer system.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g102. PubMed ID: 24415734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. California's Proposition 186: lessons from a single-payer health care reform ballot initiative campaign.
Farey K; Lingappa VR
J Public Health Policy; 1996; 17(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 8764388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single payer: the California referendum.
Fields JA; Kramer J; Poole BS
Benefits Q; 1994; 10(4):6-12. PubMed ID: 10138427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health care reform. Gridlock and pork?
Weil TP
Physician Exec; 1997 Jan; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10164286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Building blocks for reform: achieving universal coverage with private and public group health insurance.
Schoen C; Davis K; Collins SR
Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(3):646-57. PubMed ID: 18474952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?
Norato JF
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1997; 19(3):341-56. PubMed ID: 10168172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Clinton health care reform proposal: efficiency, fairness, and the role of government.
Dowd BE
Health Care Manag; 1994 Aug; 1(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 10152343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care in Hawaiì: an agenda for research and reform.
Law SA
Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(2-3):205-23. PubMed ID: 10953772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Single payer proposals alive and well in many states.
Holmes A
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 10132599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-payer health plan on California ballot.
Solomon CM
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(4):38, 45. PubMed ID: 10135423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to health care, the social contract, and health reform in the United States.
Cassel C
St Louis Univ Law J; 1994; 39(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 12465630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Arizona AHCCCS--back from the dead. What had seemed like bitter failure is now touted by independent studies as a model for reform.
Chen M
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10143177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Partnership insurance. An innovation to meet LTC financing needs.
Meiners MR
Caring; 2001 Apr; 20(4):26-7. PubMed ID: 11301967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Californians seek vote on single-payer plan.
de Lafuente D
Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(18):14. PubMed ID: 10133218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Redefining boundaries in the financing and care of diabetes: the Maryland experience.
Stuart ME
Milbank Q; 1994; 72(4):679-94. PubMed ID: 7997223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The proxy war--SCHIP and the government's role in health care reform.
Rosenbaum S
N Engl J Med; 2008 Feb; 358(9):869-72. PubMed ID: 18305263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Paying for long term care without breaking the bank.
Meiners MR
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 10126980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare and Medicaid managed care: a tale of two trajectories.
Hurley RE; Retchin SM
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jan; 12(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 16402887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health insurance flexibility and accountability initiative: opportunities and issues for states.
Engquist G; Burns P
State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2002 Aug; 3(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 12211258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
