These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10138438)
1. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges. Dollar CJ Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities. Feehan KP Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical malpractice litigation: the discoverability and use of hospitals' quality assurance committee records. Holbrook RF; Dunn LJ Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1979 Jul; 1(2):109-31. PubMed ID: 10243995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course? Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The future for peer review. Florida's constitutional amendment chills quality community. Glabman M Trustee; 2005 Apr; 58(4):6-10, 12, 1. PubMed ID: 15881498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incident reports protected from discovery and in camera review. Carr v. Howard. West JC J Healthc Risk Manag; 1998; 18(3):63-4. PubMed ID: 10184976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality of health care provider quality of care information. Healy JM; Altman WM; Fox TC Brandeis Law J; 2002; 40(3):595-658. PubMed ID: 12625350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: National Practitioner Data Bank. Pallesen KS Nebr Med J; 1991 Nov; 76(11):353-72. PubMed ID: 1784317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach. Mills DH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New JCAH standard: legal perils of compliance. Sussman DL; Roach C Hosp Risk Manage; 1980 Jan; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10289265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal review: a case study from California--the sharing of peer review information between hospitals and nonhospital providers. Brown LC Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 May; 14(4):68-73. PubMed ID: 10134763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]