These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10138747)
1. Hospital put on probation for tests on pregnant women. Hosp Ethics; 1994; 10(6):6. PubMed ID: 10138747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A feminist Fourth Amendment?: Consent, care, privacy, and social meaning in Ferguson v. City of Charleston. Taslitz AE Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():1-79. PubMed ID: 14986665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new rule for vulnerable research subjects has some special provisions. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jun; 9(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Class, race, and poverty: medical technologies and socio-political choices. Bernier BL Harv Blacklett Law J; 1994; 11():115-43. PubMed ID: 11656593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital accused of experiments on pregnant women. Roberts J BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6924):291-2. PubMed ID: 11644515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnant drug abusers are treated like criminals or not treated at all: a third option proposed. Kimbel AS J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 21(1):36-66. PubMed ID: 15799534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protection of human subjects. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Code Fed Regul Public Welfare; 1995 Oct; Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409):. PubMed ID: 11686173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. JAMA 21 years ago: Panel discusses ethics of studies on humans -- especially the poor Proposed compensations for Tuskegee Study men. Pace BP; Sullivan-Fowler M JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1692. PubMed ID: 11644855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Women in clinical trials: an introduction. Merkatz RB Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11653138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Institute of Medicine's report on women and health research: implications for IRBs and the research community. Rothenberg KH IRB; 1996; 18(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing poor pregnant women for cocaine--physicians as police investigators. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2001 May; 344(22):1729-32. PubMed ID: 11386286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. High court bars some drug tests. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2001 Mar; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 12159852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exclusion of pregnant women from research protocols: unethical and illegal. Hall JK IRB; 1995; 17(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11653053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects. Ryan AJ J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards. Addicott DC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The NIH inclusion guidelines: challenges for the future. Rothenberg KH; Hayunga EG; Rudick JE; Pinn VW IRB; 1996; 18(3):1-4, 12. PubMed ID: 11654407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. Gamble VN Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(6 Suppl):35-8. PubMed ID: 8123285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The problem of the drug-exposed newborn: a return to principled intervention. Robbin-Vergeer BI Stanford Law Rev; 1990 Feb; 42(3):745-809. PubMed ID: 10103770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A collaborative conference on women as research subjects. Dreyfus R IRB; 1998; 20(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 11657587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]