BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10139214)

  • 1. The image of inpatient imaging.
    Leckie R; Rooks VM; Hansen M; Nelson E; Embry R
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):68-70. PubMed ID: 10139214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surveying for excellence in radiology.
    Leckie R; Rooks V; Embry R
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Aug; 11(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 10121760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Streamlining the requisition process.
    Ferguson B
    Radiol Manage; 1985; 7(3):38-9. PubMed ID: 10272545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing exam quality.
    Embry R
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Mar; 11(3):29-31, 33, 35. PubMed ID: 10117666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The specification and evaluation of digital cardiac archive and review systems.
    Kennedy TE; Bergholz EW
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1996; 7(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 10158418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results from data mining in a radiology department: the relevance of data quality.
    Lang M; Kirpekar N; Bürkle T; Laumann S; Prokosch HU
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):576-80. PubMed ID: 17911782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A transcription incentive program for diagnostic imaging.
    Nestor K; Pascone AM
    Radiol Manage; 1991; 13(3):39-41. PubMed ID: 10112682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case study: a radiology department management control program.
    Correll R; Mandis M
    Radiol Manage; 1980 Apr; 2(3):24-41. PubMed ID: 10246478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. And this one is just right..
    Mulaik MW
    Radiol Manage; 2006; 28(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16676876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adapting manufacturing-based Six Sigma methodology to the service environment of a radiology film library.
    Benedetto AR
    J Healthc Manag; 2003; 48(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 12908226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technologist staffing at the National Naval Medical Center.
    Adams HG
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Mar; 10(3):23, 25, 27. PubMed ID: 10110020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Core processes: a simplified approach to performance improvement.
    Harlan KW
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 10180226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The path of least resistance: is there a better route?
    Loree A; Maihack M; Powell M
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):48-51. PubMed ID: 14603594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review in a quality assurance program: a physician acceptance model for a teaching hospital service.
    Embry R; Hansen M
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Apr; 13(4):43, 48. PubMed ID: 10134643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. System monitors productivity in diagnostic imaging.
    Brouhard CE
    Hospitals; 1981 Jul; 55(14):167-8, 170, 172 passim. PubMed ID: 7250921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-ray report turnaround studies.
    Vogel GE; Givey J
    Radiol Manage; 1984 Jun; 6(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10267083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing repeat films through a total quality management approach.
    Steel J; Perry J
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Feb; 11(2):47-9. PubMed ID: 10117444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidelines on retention of pathology records and materials, Part I (version 1/2005).
    ;
    Malays J Pathol; 2005 Jun; 27(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16676694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A patient satisfaction guarantee for diagnostic radiology.
    Brown PA
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Jan; 8(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 10275998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Inforad 98].
    Bret P
    J Radiol; 1999 May; 80(5 Suppl):509-10. PubMed ID: 10372330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.