These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10139499)

  • 1. A tale of two doctors.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1995 Jan; 12(3):3-8. PubMed ID: 10139499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
    Acevedo LJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HCQIA immunity: one win and one loss.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Aug; 21(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 15354911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital peer review is a kangaroo court.
    Townend DW
    Med Econ; 2000 Feb; 77(3):133-6, 141. PubMed ID: 10848200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 11th Circuit issues guidance on HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act) immunity.
    Roeder KH
    Ga Hosp Today; 1994 Dec; 38(12):3. PubMed ID: 10143376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal issues involving economic credentialing.
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Jul; ():20-9. PubMed ID: 12420401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review and antitrust.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):496-8. PubMed ID: 9103804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review potpourri: new developments in credentialing and privileging. Panel discussion.
    Kadzielski MA; Meinhardt RA; McCabe TA
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1995 Apr; (194):9-31. PubMed ID: 10144588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review protection statute blocks aggrieved physician.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jun; 17(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 11066398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. This doctor's peer review suit cost him $240,000.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2002 Jun; 79(12):26-8. PubMed ID: 12119735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.
    Lovitky JA
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review immunity? Think again: recent developments in federal and state law.
    Spevak C
    Physician Exec; 2007; 33(3):76-8. PubMed ID: 17539569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immunity provisions: they must be read carefully. Ironside v. Simi Valley Hospital.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2001 Feb; 18(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 11213496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antitrust protection extended to hospital authorities and physician peer review participants. Crosby v. Hospital Authority of Valdosta.
    Roeder KH; Sledge SK
    Ga Hosp Today; 1996 Nov; 40(11):3. PubMed ID: 10184649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.