221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10139676)
1. What are the Read Codes?
Booth N
Health Libr Rev; 1994 Sep; 11(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 10139676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Read clinical classification and its use in plastic surgery.
James NK
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 May; 76(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 8017810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data collection and changing health care systems. 1. United Kingdom.
Miller G; Britt H
Med J Aust; 1993 Oct; 159(7):471-6. PubMed ID: 8412921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do you Read me?
Cross M
Health Serv J; 1998 May; 108(5606):suppl 8. PubMed ID: 10180177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not--Part 2: scalability.
Benson T
BMJ; 2002 Nov; 325(7372):1090-3. PubMed ID: 12424172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The development and role of the Read Codes.
Harding A; Stuart-Buttle C
J AHIMA; 1998 May; 69(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 10179247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computing. Cracking the codes.
Mann M
Health Serv J; 1991 Jun; 101(5258):39, 41. PubMed ID: 10112563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. IT update/EPR. For the record.
Cross M
Health Serv J; 1997 Jan; 107(5538):suppl 7-8. PubMed ID: 10165728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A brief introduction to network-based coding systems.
Schulz E
Health Inf Manag; 1998; 28(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 10185786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Coding medical information: classification versus nomenclature and implications to the Israeli medical system.
Vardy DA; Gill RP; Israeli A
J Med Syst; 1998 Aug; 22(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 9690178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An overview of coding and its relationship to standardized clinical terminology.
Peden AH
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 11143274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical vocabularies and terminologies: impact on the future of health information management.
Fenton SH
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 11143283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doctors and computers. . . . While limited and uncoordinated development of information technology curtails general practitioners.
Bland M
BMJ; 2003 Jan; 326(7382):220. PubMed ID: 12549439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary care. Net values.
Mitchell P
Health Serv J; 1998 Oct; 108(5628):suppl 2-5. PubMed ID: 10187505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A methodology for the functional comparison of coding schemes in primary care.
Brown PJ; Warmington V; Laurence M; Prevost AT
Inform Prim Care; 2003; 11(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 14680537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Read Codes: a tool for automated medical records.
Green LA
J Fam Pract; 1992 May; 34(5):633-4. PubMed ID: 1578216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "We fill in our working understanding": on codes, classifications and the production of accurate data.
Winthereik BR
Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 14534655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nursing data, classification systems, and quality indicators: what every HIM professional needs to know.
Henry SB; Warren JJ; Zielstorff RD
J AHIMA; 1998 May; 69(5):48-54; quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 10179249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The history of the Read Codes: the inaugural James Read Memorial Lecture 2011.
Benson T
Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 22688227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. General practice computerisation: lessons from the United Kingdom.
Ellis NT; Kidd MR
Med J Aust; 2000 Jan; 172(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 10682012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
