BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10140231)

  • 1. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies.
    Ruta DA; Abdalla MI; Garratt AM; Coutts A; Russell IT
    Qual Health Care; 1994 Dec; 3(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 10140231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.
    Garratt AM; Ruta DA; Abdalla MI; Russell IT
    Qual Health Care; 1994 Dec; 3(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 10140232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?
    Garratt AM; Ruta DA; Abdalla MI; Buckingham JK; Russell IT
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6890):1440-4. PubMed ID: 8518640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions.
    Ruta DA; Garratt AM; Russell IT
    Qual Health Care; 1999 Mar; 8(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 10557665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins.
    Smith JJ; Garratt AM; Guest M; Greenhalgh RM; Davies AH
    J Vasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 30(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 10514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins.
    Garratt AM; Macdonald LM; Ruta DA; Russell IT; Buckingham JK; Krukowski ZH
    Qual Health Care; 1993 Mar; 2(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 10132081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability.
    Kosinski M; Keller SD; Hatoum HT; Kong SX; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5 Suppl):MS10-22. PubMed ID: 10335740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.
    Jenkinson C; Peto V; Coulter A
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Mar; 5(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 10157276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of patients with menorrhagia: how valid is a structured clinical history as a measure of health status?
    Ruta DA; Garratt AM; Chadha YC; Flett GM; Hall MH; Russell IT
    Qual Life Res; 1995 Feb; 4(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 7711689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and cultural adaptation of a German version of the AIMS2-SF questionnaire (German AIMS2-SF).
    Rosemann T; Körner T; Wensing M; Schneider A; Szecsenyi J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2005 Sep; 44(9):1190-5. PubMed ID: 15972355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.
    Salaffi F; Malavolta N; Cimmino MA; Di Matteo L; Scendoni P; Carotti M; Stancati A; Mulé R; Frigato M; Gutierrez M; Grassi W;
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2007; 25(3):390-403. PubMed ID: 17631735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.
    La Touche R; Pardo-Montero J; Gil-Martínez A; Paris-Alemany A; Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S; Suárez-Falcón JC; Lara-Lara M; Fernández-Carnero J
    Pain Physician; 2014; 17(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 24452650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of monitoring patient based health outcomes in a routine hospital setting.
    Ruta D; Coutts A; Abdalla M; Masson J; Russell E; Brunt P; McKinlay A; Mowat A; Sinclair T
    Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 10153424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A low back-specific version of the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale.
    Davidson M; Keating JL; Eyres S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Mar; 29(5):586-94. PubMed ID: 15129079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
    Brazier JE; Harper R; Jones NM; O'Cathain A; Thomas KJ; Usherwood T; Westlake L
    BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6846):160-4. PubMed ID: 1285753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: A Comparison with the DASH and SF-36 Questionnaires.
    Oda T; Abe Y; Katsumi Y; Ohi H; Nakamura T; Inagaki K
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 27454507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation study.
    Yao M; Yang L; Cao ZY; Cheng SD; Tian SL; Sun YL; Wang J; Xu BP; Hu XC; Wang YJ; Zhang Y; Cui XJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):178. PubMed ID: 28923113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial.
    Dorman P; Slattery J; Farrell B; Dennis M; Sandercock P
    Stroke; 1998 Jan; 29(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 9445330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score for back pain.
    Holt AE; Shaw NJ; Shetty A; Greenough CG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 11805669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.