These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10140362)

  • 1. The place of magnetic resonance imaging in health care.
    Hailey D; Marshall D
    Health Policy; 1995 Jan; 31(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 10140362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health care technology as a policy issue.
    Banta HD
    Health Policy; 1994; 30(1-3):1-21. PubMed ID: 10139487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An assessment of the status of magnetic resonance imaging in health care.
    Hailey D
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1997 Dec; 17(4):221-30. PubMed ID: 9427193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes and cost-effectiveness: the payer's perspective.
    Cutler CM
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S33-4. PubMed ID: 8796505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The management of health care technology in nine countries. Summary and analysis.
    Banta HD; Russell LB
    Springer Ser Health Care Soc; 1982; 7():193-237. PubMed ID: 10259694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pelvic endometriosis: impact of magnetic resonance imaging on treatment decisions and costs.
    Sugimura K; Imaoka I; Okizuka H
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S66-8. PubMed ID: 8796518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging in Canada: dissemination and funding.
    Rankin RN
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Apr; 50(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 10226630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From principle to public policy: using cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Neumann PJ; Johannesson M
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1994; 13(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 7927151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework.
    Mackenzie R; Dixon AK
    Clin Radiol; 1995 Aug; 50(8):513-8. PubMed ID: 7656516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technology assessment in different nations and lessons from a cross-sectional survey of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion.
    Gross PF
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1985; 1(3):515-36. PubMed ID: 10276732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging: in need of assessment.
    Vellet D
    Dimens Health Serv; 1991 Mar; 68(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 2029964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost considerations in the provision of magnetic resonance imaging services.
    Hailey DM; Crowe BL
    Australas Radiol; 1991 Nov; 35(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1812819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The introduction and evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in Australia.
    Hailey DM; Crowe BL
    Health Policy; 1991 Feb; 17(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 10110072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lessons from the eight countries.
    Battista RN; Banta HD; Jonnson E; Hodge M; Gelband H
    Health Policy; 1994; 30(1-3):397-421. PubMed ID: 10139496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of health technology assessment on the diffusion of MRI in Australia.
    Hailey DM; Crowe BL
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1993; 9(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 8288428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
    Jarvik JG; Hollingworth W; Martin B; Emerson SS; Gray DT; Overman S; Robinson D; Staiger T; Wessbecher F; Sullivan SD; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    JAMA; 2003 Jun; 289(21):2810-8. PubMed ID: 12783911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why buy an expensive ($7 million) 7T MRI system for biomedical research?
    Regatte RR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 24123421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic assessment of magnetic resonance imaging for inpatients: is it still too early?
    Durand-Zaleski I; Reizine D; Puzin D; Merland JJ; Blum-Boisgard C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1993; 9(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 8458705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Costs and benefits of radiology: musculoskeletal system.
    Reiser MF
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S47-8. PubMed ID: 8796510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.