These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10141040)

  • 1. Accreditation and regulation of utilization review organizations.
    McCormick VL
    Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1994; 3(6):59-61. PubMed ID: 10141040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UR accreditation raises questions among employers.
    Wise D
    Bus Health; 1993 Jan; 11(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10125563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary external review part of rebuilding MCO image.
    Galdabini G
    Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 May; 2(5):7-9. PubMed ID: 10537503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PURs (private utilization review organizations) raise serious problems, questions.
    Disch Plann Update; 1990; 10(4):1, 17-8. PubMed ID: 10105886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is private utilization review?
    Pavuk A
    Trustee; 1990 Mar; 43(3):11. PubMed ID: 10104181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Managing the claims denial appeals process.
    Lewis AB; Delaney A
    J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(3):27-31. PubMed ID: 10131213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seven tips for successful appeals.
    Hermanson JB
    QRC Advis; 1991 Sep; 7(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 10113724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A national perspective on UR (utilization review).
    Korn AM
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10113119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gauging the performance of utilization review.
    Milstein A; Oehm M; Alpert G
    Bus Health; 1987 Feb; 4(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10280661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AMA insurers agree on hospital admission utilization review guidelines.
    Admit Manage J; 1989; 15(2):23. PubMed ID: 10295787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An update on national efforts to manage private sector utilization review.
    J Qual Assur; 1991; 13(2):16-9, 44. PubMed ID: 10183482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UR only as good as what you save.
    Grobman M
    Bus Health; 1991 Jul; 9(7):20-2, 24, 26-30. PubMed ID: 10112452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization review works--most of the time.
    Zalta E
    Med Econ; 1991 Jul; 68(13):23, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10111652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PROs make us waste time and money.
    Gambrell TR
    Med Econ; 1992 Jun; 69(12):29, 32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10118826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of local UR (utilization review).
    Amos WL
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10113125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marketing utilization review services.
    DeMarco WJ; Fox BB
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1989 Apr; 7(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 10292792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appeals: the last word.
    Lewis A
    Med Interface; 1994 Aug; 7(8):50-5. PubMed ID: 10136816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Just how short can hospital stays be?
    Walker LM
    Med Econ; 1994 Sep; 71(18):38-40, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10136386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using an appeals panel to mediate mental health care UR disputes.
    Lazarus A
    Med Interface; 1994 Aug; 7(8):56-8, 76. PubMed ID: 10136817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Managed care--a symposium.
    Miller A; Herman GP; Davis PA; London AE; Klionsky MM; Howe JP; Gaver KD; Scott RR; Weissburg C
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(3):19-25. PubMed ID: 10293495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.