These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10141385)

  • 1. Alternative approaches to hysterectomy: clinical and economic implications for managed care.
    Trotter JP; Glasser MH
    Med Interface; 1995 Mar; 8(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 10141385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy.
    Dorsey JH; Holtz PM; Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Steinberg EP
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 8672153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
    Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies.
    Nezhat C; Bess O; Admon D; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):713-6. PubMed ID: 8164929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988-1994.
    Weber AM; Lee JC
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):483-9. PubMed ID: 8672154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.
    Becker ER
    J Health Care Finance; 2007; 33(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 19175228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.
    Landeen LB; Bell MC; Hubert HB; Bennis LY; Knutsen-Larson SS; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    S D Med; 2011 Jun; 64(6):197-9, 201, 203 passim. PubMed ID: 21710804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average charges for three types of hysterectomy procedures: United States, 1998.
    Mushinski M
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 2000; 81(2):27-36. PubMed ID: 10802878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy is safe for patients and reduces institutional cost.
    Levy BS; Luciano DE; Emery LL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(6):494-501. PubMed ID: 16337576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Impact on costs and clinical outcome.
    Chang WC; Lin CC
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Apr; 48(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 12746988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Types of hysterectomy. Comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes.
    Campbell ES; Xiao H; Smith MK
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Dec; 48(12):943-9. PubMed ID: 14738021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Vaginal hysterectomy assisted by laparoscopy. Critical and comparative study if vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy at the A.B.C. Hospital of Mexico].
    Kably Ambe A; Barroso-Villa G; Jurado-Jurado M; Almanza R; García León F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Sep; 65():362-7. PubMed ID: 9410805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance applied to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a pilot study.
    Jones IS; Lapsley HM
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1994 Sep; 14(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 7981931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysterectomy charges: geographic variations United States, 1994.
    Mushinski M
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1996; 77(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8744890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital.
    Johns DA; Carrera B; Jones J; DeLeon F; Vincent R; Safely C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1709-15; discussion 1715-9. PubMed ID: 7778623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs traditional total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies.
    Bronitsky C; Payne RJ; Stuckey S; Wilkins D
    J Gynecol Surg; 1993; 9(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 10172016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative costs of gynecologic endoscopy vs traditional surgery for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding.
    Hidlebaugh DA
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7 Spec No():SP31-7. PubMed ID: 11599673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].
    Tan XJ; Lang JH; Shen K; Liu ZF; Sun DW; Leng JH; Zhu L
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 25(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 12974083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.