160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10141511)
1. HMOs adapt to Medicaid market.
Kertesz L
Mod Healthc; 1995 Apr; 25(15):42-3. PubMed ID: 10141511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Are states' cost-cutting measures forcing HMOs from Medicaid?
Kantor A
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Mar; 11(3):60-3. PubMed ID: 10181537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives. Medicaid HMOs: going gets tougher in new environment.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1998 Jan; 52(2):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10176249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The implementation of managed behavioral healthcare in Colorado and the effects on older Medicaid beneficiaries.
Kaskie B; Wallace N; Kang S; Bloom J
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2006 Mar; 9(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 16733268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. At a glance. Percentage of Medicare beneficiaries in traditional Medicare and risk HMOs with supplemental health insurance.
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Jan; 53(1):20. PubMed ID: 10339159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An alternative to global capitation for ESRD: global fee-for-service.
Amerling R
Nephrol News Issues; 2000 Jul; 14(8):15-6. PubMed ID: 12101516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Capitation still strong in competitive HMO markets.
Capitation Rates Data; 2003 Dec; 8(12):133-6. PubMed ID: 14768419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fewer HMOs relying solely on capitation, data show.
Capitation Rates Data; 2002 Jun; 7(6):65-6. PubMed ID: 12108227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Administrative benchmarks for Medicare, Medicaid HMOs.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1998 Nov; 4(11):171-2. PubMed ID: 10187427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arizona paves way for Medicaid risk contracts.
Manag Care Strateg; 1998 Aug; 6(8):92. PubMed ID: 10185969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Study finds utilization up among Medicaid risk members who don't understand managed care.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 Jun; 3(6):92-3. PubMed ID: 10175084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Managed care and the under-privileged in the United States].
Simonet D
Cah Sociol Demogr Med; 2002; 42(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 12050942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The difference between success and failure: NY plans, providers share Medicaid strategies.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 May; 3(5):71-3. PubMed ID: 10174873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey reveals dramatic increase in capitation.
Capitation Manag Rep; 1997 Jan; 4(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 10174918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HMOs, providers sharing data key to making capitation work.
Kertesz L
Mod Healthc; 1996 Jan; 26(2):47. PubMed ID: 10153958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Service-level selection by HMOs in Medicare.
Cao Z; McGuire TG
J Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 22(6):915-31. PubMed ID: 14604553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. South Carolina providers succeed with Medicaid risk plans.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2002 Nov; 9(11):169-73, 161. PubMed ID: 12503294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. More, more, more: critical study could mean big changes at Medicaid contracting table.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 Mar; 3(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 10175079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare HMOs reveal unique contracting strategies for new ESRD risk demonstration.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1997 May; 3(5):74-6. PubMed ID: 10174874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the impact of open-access HMOs on providers.
Fried I
Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Sep; 51(9):50-1. PubMed ID: 10170317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
