164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10142219)
41. Should you submit your PPR results to JCAHO? Take the opportunity to obtain valuable feedback.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):108-10. PubMed ID: 15338823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Groups, Joint Commission meet.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1994 Oct; 24(42):6. PubMed ID: 10137246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Relationship between performance measurement and accreditation: implications for quality of care and patient safety.
Miller MR; Pronovost P; Donithan M; Zeger S; Zhan C; Morlock L; Meyer GS
Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(5):239-52. PubMed ID: 16221832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Try these foolproof tips to be ready for JCAHO.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 May; 29(5):63-5. PubMed ID: 15162672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. JCAHO may give quality data to HCFA.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(4):6. PubMed ID: 10291667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Approved: Revisions to the review and appeal procedures for adverse decisions.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1, 12-4. PubMed ID: 22315794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. APPROVED: Revisions to the review and appeal procedures.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2013 Jan; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23390727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Approved: accreditation status of organizations that cease services after a disaster.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):3. PubMed ID: 17139924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. 2009 accreditation decision rules.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Aug; 28(8):13-9. PubMed ID: 18798365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. JCAHO's new accreditation process.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Nov; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 14651075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. REVISED: Accreditation with Follow-up Survey and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation Decision Processes for Organizations Undergoing Resurvey.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2015 Mar; 35(3):1, 3, 5. PubMed ID: 26427283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Revision: Rationale for accreditation participation requirement 10.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Nov; 26(11):7. PubMed ID: 17176701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Revision: accreditation decision rule PDA04.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Apr; 27(4):5. PubMed ID: 17472126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Scoring definitions revised for all accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):5. PubMed ID: 11246634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. JCAHO to study closures.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep; 19(38):6. PubMed ID: 10294772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Discussion of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' Agenda for Change.
Fogg D
AORN J; 1993 Jul; 58(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 8338356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. HFAP survey earns facility referral status.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2003 Oct; 10(10):117-8. PubMed ID: 14535135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Revisions to participation requirements for the Cooperative Accreditation Initiative.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):11. PubMed ID: 15969301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
