243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10142374)
1. Refinement of the Medicare diagnosis-related groups to incorporate a measure of severity.
Edwards N; Honemann D; Burley D; Navarro M
Health Care Financ Rev; 1994; 16(2):45-64. PubMed ID: 10142374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HCFA to add measure of severity to DRGs. Part II.
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(4):30-4. PubMed ID: 10135421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HCFA to add measure of severity to DRGs. Part I.
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 10134511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. All-payer severity-adjusted diagnosis-related groups: a uniform method to severity-adjust discharge data.
Leary RS; Johantgen ME; Farley D; Forthman MT; Wooster LD
Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):60-71. PubMed ID: 10165388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extra training needed for DRGs. Concerns arise on coding, payment issues for system.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Aug; 37(32):8-9. PubMed ID: 17960717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Development of classification and payment system of in patient hospital admissions in the United States: introduction of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS-DRGs) and the Present On Admission (POA) indicator].
Maurici M; Rosati E
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2007; 63(6):691-701. PubMed ID: 18216884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A closer look at all-patient refined DRGs.
Averill RF; Goldfield NI; Muldoon J; Steinbeck BA; Grant TM
J AHIMA; 2002 Jan; 73(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 12469662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What proposed DRG refinements mean for hospitals. Part III.
Shoemaker P
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(5):6, 8-11. PubMed ID: 10137370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Change in MS-DRG assignment and hospital reimbursement as a result of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid changes in payment for hospital-acquired conditions: is it coding or quality?
McNutt R; Johnson TJ; Odwazny R; Remmich Z; Skarupski K; Meurer S; Hohmann S; Harting B
Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20042930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case-mix measurements for understanding and managing healthcare institutions.
Duncan DG; Goldfield NI
J AHIMA; 1993 Jul; 64(7):44-6, 48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10127212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coding and documentation: Medicare severity diagnosis-related groups and present-on-admission documentation.
Ballentine NH
J Hosp Med; 2009 Feb; 4(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 19219928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing a case-mix model for PPS.
Goldberg HB; Delargy D
Caring; 2000 Jan; 19(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 10787813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in Diagnosis Related Groups for Inpatient Admissions and Associated Changes in Payment From 2012 to 2016.
Gluckman TJ; Spinelli KJ; Wang M; Yazdani A; Grunkemeier G; Bradley SM; Wasfy JH; Goyal A; Oseran A; Joynt Maddox KE
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2028470. PubMed ID: 33284340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How hospitals can prepare for the new MS-DRGs.
Bush H
Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Mar; 82(3):5 p following 44. PubMed ID: 18429476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The codes to watch: identifying the DRGs most prone to payment error.
Hrehor K
J AHIMA; 2005; 76(7):36-40. PubMed ID: 16097120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Did the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system result in changes in relative patient severity and relative resource use?
Paddock SM; Escarce JJ; Hayden O; Buntin MB
Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17224774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare program; payments for new medical services and new technologies under the acute care hospital inpatient prospective payment system. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2001 Sep; 66(174):46901-25. PubMed ID: 11757576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
