171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10142460)
1. Nurses and central service managers share job and quality concerns over work redesign.
Sherer J
Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Mar; 4(3):26, 28. PubMed ID: 10142460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Passages. Work redesign doesn't have to hurt CS quality.
McCormack J
Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Mar; 4(3):22, 24, 26-8. PubMed ID: 10142459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spotlight--clinician perspectives on redesign. Interview by Terry G. Williams.
Balke P; Blakewell M
PFCA Rev; 1995; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 10151689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Calif. nurses file suit to stop work redesign.
Kertesz L
Mod Healthc; 1994 Sep; 24(38):14. PubMed ID: 10136442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Another look at work design in hospitals: redesigning the work roles of nurses.
Birnbaum D; Somers MJ
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1995; 17(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 10153073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Union uprising. California nurses react aggressively to work redesign.
Sherer JL
Hosp Health Netw; 1994 Dec; 68(24):36, 38. PubMed ID: 7994301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What redesign efforts mean to case managers.
Hosp Case Manag; 1995 Nov; 3(11):178-9. PubMed ID: 10153571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the multifunctional worker role: a stakeholder analysis.
Jones KR; Redman RW; VandenBosch TM; Holdwick C; Wolgin F
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 10603886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unlicensed hospital assistive personnel: efficiency or liability?
Kreplick J
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):292-309. PubMed ID: 10156295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical implications of re-engineering.
Nowicki M
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1995 Feb; 13(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10142507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Re-engineering: a smart move or the downfall of quality care?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 May; 20(5):69-72. PubMed ID: 10153196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-centered process of work redesign. Arizona hospital reengineers with no outside help.
Doerge J; Hagenow N
Health Prog; 1995; 76(8):28-32. PubMed ID: 10152929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurses resist change, need CEO's attention.
McEachern S
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1995 May; 13(5):1, 19-23. PubMed ID: 10142547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Calif. nurses lose court decision on hospital's gag rule.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):56. PubMed ID: 10152140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of reengineering in health care.
Lin B; Vassar JA
Health Care Superv; 1996 Dec; 15(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 10162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Employee response to major organizational redesign.
Ingersoll GL; Fisher M; Ross B; Soja M; Kidd N
Appl Nurs Res; 2001 Feb; 14(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 11172226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurses: the saga continues.
Brown LL
Health Syst Rev; 1996; 29(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10154385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolving role of the health care supervisor: shifting paradigms, changing perceptions, and other traps.
McConnell CR
Health Care Superv; 1996 Sep; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10159634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of hospital downsizing on staffing and quality of care.
Robertson R; Dowd SB
Health Care Superv; 1996 Mar; 14(3):50-6. PubMed ID: 10154921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality improvement: the divergent views of managers and clinicians.
Price M; Fitzgerald L; Kinsman L
J Nurs Manag; 2007 Jan; 15(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 17207006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
