These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10143112)
1. Group advances method to weigh value of new medical technology. Scott L Mod Healthc; 1995 Jun; 25(25):78. PubMed ID: 10143112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective value-based assessment of new health care technologies and practices. Girod CS; Axene DV Manag Care; 2000 Aug; 9(8):38-40, 43-7. PubMed ID: 11186514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marketplace. Assessing medical innovations: how health plans pick what technology to cover. Moskowitz DB Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1997 May; 51(21):suppl 2 p.. PubMed ID: 10167124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies. Matuszewski KA Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicare and medical technology--the growing demand for relevant outcomes. Neumann PJ; Tunis SR N Engl J Med; 2010 Feb; 362(5):377-9. PubMed ID: 20089955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining quality health care with outcomes assessment while achieving economic value. Shaw LJ; Miller DD Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Feb; 20(3):44-54. PubMed ID: 10747434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost and technology: the management of technology in health and medical care. Clin Eng; 1980; 8(2):13-5. PubMed ID: 10309129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care technology. Robbins K State Health Care Am; 1994; ():63-6. PubMed ID: 10133853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Technology assessment and the doctor-patient relationship. Wax AL Va Law Rev; 1996 Nov; 82(8):1641-62. PubMed ID: 16715567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Striking a balance on new technology. Cost-effectiveness analysis can help sort out emerging health care technologies, but what are the consequences for continued medical innovation? Philipson TJ; Jena AB AHIP Cover; 2006; 47(5):29, 31, 33. PubMed ID: 17007325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital technology assessment: Part II. Rizkalla E J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996 May; 14(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10158189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices. Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Embedding quality improvement and patient safety: the UCLA value analysis experience. Gambone JC; Broder MS Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):581-92. PubMed ID: 17400513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of cost-benefit analysis in health care field questioned. Am Med News; 1980 Aug; 23(33):1. PubMed ID: 10309251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development. Wallner PE; Konski A J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1125-9. PubMed ID: 18954812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy assessment criteria based on risk and cost. MacIntyre NR Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):968-70. PubMed ID: 10152241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost and effectiveness: approval and payment for Pulverizer. Riegelman R Md Med; 2002; 3(3):50-4. PubMed ID: 12214498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]