165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10143362)
1. Making choices: the ethical problems in determining criteria for health care rationing.
Ramsay M
Health Care Anal; 1995 May; 3(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 10143362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Resource allocation--what is the first priority?
Katekar LV
J Med Ethics; 1992 Jun; 18(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 1619630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Four unsolved rationing problems. A challenge.
Daniels N
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 7960702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics, institutional complexity and health care reform: the struggle for normative balance.
Graetz MJ; Mashaw JL
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():93-104. PubMed ID: 10134818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. To whom?
Kamm FM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(4):29-32. PubMed ID: 7960703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rationing--missing ingredient in health care reform.
Young EW
West J Med; 1994 Jul; 161(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 7941521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical constraints on rationing medical care by age.
Jecker NS; Pearlman RA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1989 Nov; 37(11):1067-75. PubMed ID: 2809055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The economic attributes of medical care: implications for rationing choices in the United States and United Kingdom.
Banks DA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 8985585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measured fairness, situated justice: feminist reflections on health care rationing.
Nelson JL
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Mar; 6(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 10157550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research on "big ticket" items: ethical implications for equitable access.
Veatch RM
J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 7921082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tetraplegics and the justice of resource allocation.
Walsh P
Paraplegia; 1993 Mar; 31(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 8479776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Healthcare rationing through global budgeting: the ethical choices.
Veatch RM
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 7749173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Age as a basis for healthcare rationing. Support for agist policies.
Shaw AB
Drugs Aging; 1996 Dec; 9(6):403-5. PubMed ID: 8972240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obligation to the least well off in setting mental health service priorities: a consensus statement.
Rosenheck R; Armstrong M; Callahan D; Dea R; Del Vecchio P; Flynn L; Fox RC; Goldman HH; Horvath T; Munoz R
Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Oct; 49(10):1273-4, 1290. PubMed ID: 9779894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics and priority setting in Oregon.
Callahan D
Health Aff (Millwood); 1991; 10(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 1885149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?
Hope T
J Med Ethics; 2001 Jun; 27(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 11417026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allocating healthcare by QALYs: the relevance of age.
Mckie J; Kuhse H; Richardson J; Singer P
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(4):534-45. PubMed ID: 8985584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Under the knife": an examination of the Oregon Basic Health Act, the Clinton Health Security Plan and their impact on ethical health care rationing in Canada.
Ross A
Health Law Can; 1995 Nov; 16(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 10170067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. All for one or one for all? The ethics of resource allocation for health care.
Leeder SR
Med J Aust; 1987 Jul; 147(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 3600455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The aggregation problem.
Rakowski E
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 7960704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
