These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10143461)

  • 1. The ethical, medical, and legal implications of the forcible treatment provisions of the Criminal Code.
    Hewak N
    Health Law Can; 1995; 15(4):107-16. PubMed ID: 10143461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rebuttal to Nancy Hewak's "The Ethical, Medical and Legal Implications of the Forcible Treatment Provisions of the Criminal Code".
    Murphy E; Zoffman E
    Health Law Can; 1996 Feb; 16(3):65. PubMed ID: 10178136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [On the relationship between psychiatry and criminal law from a legal standpoint].
    Schöch H
    Nervenarzt; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1382-8. PubMed ID: 16247618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction of the criminal justice system and psychiatric professionals in which civil commitment standards are prohibitive.
    Solomon P; Rogers R; Draine J; Meyerson A
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 7599364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatric research on mentally disordered offenders.
    Munthe C; Radovic S; Anckarsäter H
    Bioethics; 2010 Jan; 24(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 20017746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Rozovsky L
    Dimens Health Serv; 1978 Nov; 55(11):38-9. PubMed ID: 710746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons.
    Humber JM
    Soc Sci Med F; 1981 Dec; 15(4):143-50. PubMed ID: 7336226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Basics of civil and criminal law of psychiatric coercive measures in France].
    Gravier B; Völlm B
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Mar; 34(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 17390265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ethical aspects of forensic psychiatry].
    Muysers J
    Psychiatr Prax; 2014 Jul; 41 Suppl 1():S54-7. PubMed ID: 24983577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
    Dunlap JA
    KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criminality, confinement, psychiatric care and consent: a dilemma augmenting combination.
    Somerville MA
    Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():147-59. PubMed ID: 10287957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mentally ill and dangerous: civil commitment or internment? The Belgian judicial framework].
    Smets H; Verelst R; Vandenberghe J
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 19434576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug-induced alteration of psychotic behavior: who benefits?
    Schaefer GJ
    J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):43-68. PubMed ID: 11654455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.