256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10145890)
1. Adventures in recycling: the reuse of "disposable" pulse oximeter probes.
Salyer JW; Burton K; Lynch J; Ballard J; Keenan J
Respir Care; 1993 Oct; 38(10):1072-6. PubMed ID: 10145890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulse oximetry sensor recycling cuts Utah hospital's costs.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1994 Jan; 7(4):9-10. PubMed ID: 10132031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital saves with recycled disposable probes, but safety questions persist.
Werner C
Hosp Mater Manage; 1994 Apr; 19(4):6. PubMed ID: 10133470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of laminated disposable pulse-oximeter sensors.
Russell GB; Graybeal JM
Respir Care; 1995 Jul; 40(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 10144067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
MacLean C
Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Source reduction and the disposables vs. reusables debate.
Belkin NL
Regul Anal Med Waste; 1993 Jun; 1(9):6-11. PubMed ID: 10132846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longevity of Masimo and Nellcor pulse oximeter sensors in the care of infants.
Erler T; Avenarius S; Wischniewski E; Schmidt K; Kläber HG
J Perinatol; 2003 Mar; 23(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 12673263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reusable, re-posable and disposable instrumentation.
Melzer A; Buess G
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):127-8. PubMed ID: 7552127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disposable versus reusable instrumentation.
Maddern GJ; Bessell JR
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):125-6. PubMed ID: 7552126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Economics slow to decide oximeter sensor debate.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1992 Jan; 22(2):33. PubMed ID: 10115805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reach the bottom line on reuse. Weights and balances.
Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):40, 42. PubMed ID: 10167495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Re-sterilization of disposable products: a gamble].
Haindl H
Pflege Z; 2002 Feb; 55(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12640997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gown prices head downward.
Hosp Mater Manage; 2004 Mar; 29(3):1, 11-4. PubMed ID: 15035047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscope price hikes continue.
Hosp Mater Manage; 2005 Jun; 30(6):1, 12-4. PubMed ID: 16018418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [In favor of ecology and economy. Future recycling concepts].
Oral N
Pflege Z; 2000 Feb; 53(2):83. PubMed ID: 10797745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Disposable vs reusable laryngeal mask airway: a cost-minimization analysis].
Soulias M; Martin L; Garnier N; Juniot A; Aho LS; Freysz M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Aug; 25(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 16603333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
