122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10145945)
1. The Australian National Non-Acute Inpatient Project.
Roberts R; McKinley S; Brooks B; Ganley E; Hindle D
Aust Health Rev; 1993; 16(3):300-19. PubMed ID: 10145945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-acute casemix in the Illawarra.
Lee L; Goor E; Kennedy C; Walters S; Kirby L
J Qual Clin Pract; 1994 Mar; 14(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8199755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Casemix classification payment for sub-acute and non-acute inpatient care, Thailand.
Khiaocharoen O; Pannarunothai S; Zungsontiporn C; Riewpaiboon W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):849-59. PubMed ID: 20649066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of length of stay in a geriatric assessment and rehabilitation unit.
Subramaniam C; Gray LC; Farish S
Aust Health Rev; 1995; 18(2):56-68. PubMed ID: 10144339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a casemix classification system for inpatient rehabilitation services: stage 1 of the Victorian Rehabilitation Project.
Webster F
Aust Health Rev; 1996; 19(3):81-92. PubMed ID: 10162010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trialling diagnosis-related groups classification in the Iranian health system: a case study examining the feasibility of introducing casemix.
Ghaffari S; Doran C; Wilson A; Aisbett C
East Mediterr Health J; 2010 May; 16(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 20799543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-stay older patients in acute hospitals: are they bed blockers?
Renwick M; Gillett S; Liu Z
Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(3):284-98. PubMed ID: 10128752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities are now paid prospective rates.
Grimaldi PL
J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):32-48. PubMed ID: 12079150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system--case study from the general wards of one central hospital.
Rainio AK; Ohinmaa AE
J Clin Nurs; 2005 Jul; 14(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 15946275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the NAIP classification predict length of stay in rehabilitation, geriatrics and palliative care?
Lee L; Kennedy C; Aitken J
Aust Health Rev; 1996; 19(2):56-74. PubMed ID: 10159217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appropriateness of bed usage for inpatients admitted as emergencies to internal medicine services.
Armstrong SH; Peden NR; Nimmo S; Alcorn M
Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Nov; 59(6):388-95. PubMed ID: 12661389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: technical development and results.
Eagar K; Green J; Gordon R
Palliat Med; 2004 Apr; 18(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 15198134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influences on nursing care volume.
Arndt M; Crane S
J Soc Health Syst; 1998; 5(4):38-49. PubMed ID: 9785296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inpatient utilization of short-stay hospitals by diagnosis United States, 1978.
McCarthy E
Vital Health Stat 13; 1981 Aug; (55):1-79, 2 p preceding table of contents. PubMed ID: 15791759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Prospective payment in medical rehabilitation].
Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Jun; 42(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12813650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: lessons and policy implications of a national study.
Eagar K; Gordon R; Green J; Smith M
Palliat Med; 2004 Apr; 18(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 15198135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probabilistic linkage of computerized ambulance and inpatient hospital discharge records: a potential tool for evaluation of emergency medical services.
Dean JM; Vernon DD; Cook L; Nechodom P; Reading J; Suruda A
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 37(6):616-26. PubMed ID: 11385330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resource utilization groups. A patient classification system for long-term care.
Fries BE; Cooney LM
Med Care; 1985 Feb; 23(2):110-22. PubMed ID: 3919222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classifying sub-acute and non-acute patients: results of the New South Wales Casemix Area Network study.
Eagar K; Cromwell D; Kennedy C; Lee L
Aust Health Rev; 1997; 20(2):26-42. PubMed ID: 10169365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
