68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10146688)
1. Routine fetal ultrasound: a billion dollar baby?
Bieze J
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):65-74. PubMed ID: 10146688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal Down syndrome screening: a cost effectiveness analysis of alternative screening programs.
Cusick W; Vintzileos AM
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 10582856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of ultrasound screening options for structural fetal malformations.
Vanara F; Bergeretti F; Gaglioti P; Todros T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 15517556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal screening of congenital heart disease between ethics and cost-effectiveness. Time for a change in current prenatal ultrasound screening policies?
Paladini D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 10586471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound-related litigation in obstetrics and gynecology: the need for defensive scanning.
Meire HB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 8726872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The development of obstetric ultrasound in Switzerland].
Zimmermann R
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Apr; 45(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 15818049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Trisomy 21 screening: value of ultrasound and serum markers in a combined approach].
Senat MV; Rozenberg P; Bernard JP; Ville Y
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Feb; 30(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 11240502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine ultrasound in early pregnancy.
Anderson T
Pract Midwife; 1998 Dec; 1(12):13-4. PubMed ID: 10214284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Malpractice losses in obstetrics. A review of claims.
Goley RB; Kearney P
N J Med; 2002 Oct; 99(10):45-53. PubMed ID: 12400236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Antenatal screening for Down syndrome: a smattering of epidemiology].
Boulvain M; Billieux MH; Irion O
Rev Med Suisse; 2008 Oct; 4(176):2276-8, 2280. PubMed ID: 19025178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine ultrasound screening.
Gomez KJ; Copel JA
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 6(5):426-9. PubMed ID: 7827272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prenatal ultrasound screening and urinary tract findings].
Luoma R; Raboei E
Duodecim; 2002; 118(11):1121-5. PubMed ID: 12239843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach.
Brown R
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Apr; 106(4):397-8. PubMed ID: 10426250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Financial implications of routine screening ultrasound.
DeVore GR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 8774093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine ultrasound screening in low-risk pregnancies: imperatives for further study.
Ecker JL; Frigoletto FD
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 93(4):607-10. PubMed ID: 10214843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost of routine ultrasonography.
Gunderson EW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):581-2. PubMed ID: 8059857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.
Titapant V; Chawanpaiboon S; Mingmitpatanakul K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Sep; 84(9):1251-7. PubMed ID: 11800297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liability in prenatal ultrasound screening.
Mavroforou A; Mavrophoros D; Koumantakis E; Michalodimitrakis E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 12808666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing bimanual pelvic examination to ultrasound measurement for assessment of gestational age in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Nichols M; Morgan E; Jensen JT
J Reprod Med; 2002 Oct; 47(10):825-8. PubMed ID: 12418065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
