These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10146688)

  • 1. Routine fetal ultrasound: a billion dollar baby?
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):65-74. PubMed ID: 10146688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal Down syndrome screening: a cost effectiveness analysis of alternative screening programs.
    Cusick W; Vintzileos AM
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 10582856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation of ultrasound screening options for structural fetal malformations.
    Vanara F; Bergeretti F; Gaglioti P; Todros T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 15517556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal screening of congenital heart disease between ethics and cost-effectiveness. Time for a change in current prenatal ultrasound screening policies?
    Paladini D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 10586471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound-related litigation in obstetrics and gynecology: the need for defensive scanning.
    Meire HB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 8726872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The development of obstetric ultrasound in Switzerland].
    Zimmermann R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Apr; 45(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 15818049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Trisomy 21 screening: value of ultrasound and serum markers in a combined approach].
    Senat MV; Rozenberg P; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Feb; 30(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 11240502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine ultrasound in early pregnancy.
    Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Dec; 1(12):13-4. PubMed ID: 10214284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Malpractice losses in obstetrics. A review of claims.
    Goley RB; Kearney P
    N J Med; 2002 Oct; 99(10):45-53. PubMed ID: 12400236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Antenatal screening for Down syndrome: a smattering of epidemiology].
    Boulvain M; Billieux MH; Irion O
    Rev Med Suisse; 2008 Oct; 4(176):2276-8, 2280. PubMed ID: 19025178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine ultrasound screening.
    Gomez KJ; Copel JA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 6(5):426-9. PubMed ID: 7827272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prenatal ultrasound screening and urinary tract findings].
    Luoma R; Raboei E
    Duodecim; 2002; 118(11):1121-5. PubMed ID: 12239843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach.
    Brown R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Apr; 106(4):397-8. PubMed ID: 10426250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Financial implications of routine screening ultrasound.
    DeVore GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 8774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine ultrasound screening in low-risk pregnancies: imperatives for further study.
    Ecker JL; Frigoletto FD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 93(4):607-10. PubMed ID: 10214843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost of routine ultrasonography.
    Gunderson EW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):581-2. PubMed ID: 8059857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.
    Titapant V; Chawanpaiboon S; Mingmitpatanakul K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Sep; 84(9):1251-7. PubMed ID: 11800297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liability in prenatal ultrasound screening.
    Mavroforou A; Mavrophoros D; Koumantakis E; Michalodimitrakis E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 12808666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing bimanual pelvic examination to ultrasound measurement for assessment of gestational age in the first trimester of pregnancy.
    Nichols M; Morgan E; Jensen JT
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Oct; 47(10):825-8. PubMed ID: 12418065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.