152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10146690)
1. Assessing medical technology.
Moliter B
Rehab Manag; 1994; 7(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 10146690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health care technology.
Robbins K
State Health Care Am; 1994; ():63-6. PubMed ID: 10133853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who will pay the bill for outcomes research?
Bieze J
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Jul; 16(7):47-9, 52, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10147291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Conception and conversion of medical technology assessment--an international comparison].
Berndt K; Hinzpeter B; Kurscheid T; Lauterbach KW
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 May; 92(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 9675828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical technologies at the dawn of the German health-care reform.
Schmitt JM
Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 12774578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health technology management in the Department of Health and Human Services.
Cooper DI; Behney C
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1982; 5(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 10258781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy.
Huang L
J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 10137111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health Policy Report. Another chance for technology assessment.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1983 Aug; 309(8):509-12. PubMed ID: 6348544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Welcoming a new decade and reflecting on the "2000s": considerations for the discipline of nursing.
Olshansky E
J Prof Nurs; 2010 Jan; 26(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20129586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Technology assessment: measuring the outcomes of laboratory practice.
Wilkinson DS
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2000; 14(6):267-71. PubMed ID: 11210211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The assessment of technology in medical care: recent developments.
Perry S
Trans Stud Coll Physicians Phila; 1979 Jun; 1(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 505524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New trends in technology assessment: will comparative-effectiveness research and healthcare reform stifle medical device innovation?
Gross L
J Ambul Care Manage; 2010; 33(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 20838114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing outcomes in population health: moving the field forward.
Gold MR; McCoy KI; Teutsch SM; Haddix AC
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 9037335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health technology assessment.
Papatheofanis FJ
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10967621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes research necessary for successful health care reform.
Keatley MA; Miller TI
Healthspan; 1993 Oct; 10(9):18-20. PubMed ID: 10130397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Closer inspection: the recent evolution of technology assessment.
Goodman CS
Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(2):38-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 10165990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The future of medical technology assessment in Germany--five proposals for its development].
Berndt K; Hinzpeter B; Lauterbach KW
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Aug; 92(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 9757520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology assessment and public health.
Power EJ; Tunis SR; Wagner JL
Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():561-79. PubMed ID: 8054099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison analysis. Critics questioning design of effectiveness studies.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2009 Feb; 39(8):10. PubMed ID: 19274822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies.
Matuszewski KA
Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
